Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic
It's not silly at all. Are you saying it does have a quantitive unit of measure? If so, what is it?

Here are the definitions of the words you seem to be having trouble with:

Quantitative: How much evidence - the quantity of evidence
Qualitative: How good the evidence may be - your opinion.

Why don't you look up the words rather than ask me to explain it to you - don't be so intellectually lazy.

You are making a quantitative statement (speaking of the amount of evidence) and then you try to back it up by making qualitative statements (you don't think the quality of the evidence is good) - very illogical.

1,156 posted on 10/04/2006 1:20:36 PM PDT by Last Visible Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1154 | View Replies ]


To: Last Visible Dog
Quantitative: How much evidence - the quantity of evidence

And what exactly is the unit of measure of evidence that I am expressing a quantity of? You do understand "unit of measure" don't you? You claim that in is inaccurate to say that there is "no evidence" there. If that is the case, perhaps you can tell me exactly how much evidence there is.

I've already agreed to change my assesment from "no evidence" to "non-existent evidence" and then to "fraudulent evidence" to try and find something that suits you. What more do you want?

1,157 posted on 10/04/2006 1:59:26 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1156 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson