[Last Visible Dog]

you can't make a quantitative assesment of something that doesn't have a quantitative unit of measure.

So now you are claiming the amount of evidence does not have a quantitative unit of measure - do you realize how silly of a statement you just made.

Like I said, you can dig as deep of a hole as you desire - your arguments lack understanding of the terms - not to mention your statements lack reasoning - you just want to "win"

We will have to agree to disagree.

[tacticalogic]

So now you are claiming the amount of evidence does not have a quantitative unit of measure - do you realize how silly of a statement you just made.

It's not silly at all. Are you saying it does have a quantitive unit of measure? If so, what is it?