yes, i can tell you are not a lawyer at least not one of any training and experience. Thank you for admitting it.
Spelling errors - this thread as this point doesnt warrant spell check..my interest is substance
"Drug Mules" contrary to your assertion, see post 78 zeven lines from bottom. Youre not paying attention.
apparently if you were on the jury you would acquit hillary clinton for her participation in this fraudulent scheme, its weak minded jurors and prosecutors like that that have allowed these criminals to run amok for so long.
I never once claimed to be a lawyer. I have; however, asked it YOU are a lawyer and you never answered that query. But you are NOT a lawyer, though you are trying to pretend that you are. LOL
You've back pedaled, you've changed topics, you have refused to show ANY proof to substantiate your position, and throughout this entire thread, your Clintonian posts have been stunningly devoid of anything even remotely credible. So let's play it your way, since my straight forward way, appears to confuse you utterly.
Apparently, if you were on any jury, you would be the one person who threw they entire proceedings into a cocked hat, because of your inability to follow instructions and directions. It's weak minded people like you, who instead of recognizing your own inadequacies, pretend that you are the expert. Not only would you have freed O.J., but you would have, instead, tried to convict the dog.
And now, ramble on, post and post and post and post some more replies........the last word is your's; spurious though they surely will be.