Come on, step up to the plate, post each and every case, since there are many of them,*snicker* that will prove what you have been claiming. Is that asking too much of you, to post some facts for a change?
Even when I wrote as simply as I could, it was still over your head.
What I posted is not true? It is not accurate, factual, nor true? Then prove it, prove it with citations.
You just keep repeating the same thing, word for word, while claiming that it's true and yet, that is what you accuse me of doing, even though I posted specifics, which at the beginning of this, you didn't know. LOL
Hillary Clinton committed several felonies through her participation in the cattle futures payoff. These include accessory to bribery and accessorie to mail fraud.
Do you contend she did not commit those crimes?
Do you contend she could not be prosecuted for those crimes if not why not?
The answers are obvious, of course she committed the crimes, and of course they were prosecutable.
Your position that because no one else who received payoffs through the broker was prosecuted, therefore Hillary could not be prosecuted is a non-sequitor.
Your position, no matter how often repeated nor how much feigned amusement you attach to it, is, frankly, suggestive of some kind of intellectual or characterological impairment.
Go ahead repeat yourself again without addressing the real point i.e. what factual or legal barrier existed to prevent prosecution of Hillary for the cattle futures payoff?
Hillary Clinton committed several felonies through her participation in the cattle futures payoff. These include accessory to bribery and accessorie to mail fraud.
Do you contend she did not commit those crimes?
Do you contend she could not be prosecuted for those crimes if not why not?
The answers are obvious, of course she committed the crimes, and of course they were prosecutable.
Your position that because no one else who received payoffs through the broker was prosecuted, therefore Hillary could not be prosecuted is a non-sequitor.
Your position, no matter how often repeated nor how much feigned amusement you attach to it, is, frankly, suggestive of some kind of intellectual or characterological impairment.
Go ahead repeat yourself again without addressing the real point i.e. what factual or legal barrier existed to prevent prosecution of Hillary for the cattle futures payoff?