What Wallace should have asked is Mr. Clinton how can people believe you when you were convicted of committing perjury during the Lewinsky scandal? Were you convicted of not telling the truth under oath ? If so would you answer for us what Sandy Berger stuffed in his socks that he has never returned to our archives.
Liberals will just view this as Clinton standing up to Foxnews. They are just trying to energize them for the election.
Chris Wallace just guaranteed that the Beast won't sit for Any FOX interview.
I really do believe this is the first time, in a one-on-one, that either of these greasy pus-bags has EVER been asked a question that they did not "authorize".
And I can't believe that this was pre-planned to provide cover for Cankles or the Dem candidates like has been suggested on other threads.
Chris was definitely uncomfortable and I do believe he felt physically threatened