[ark_girl]

Not only that, but did you notice how he redirected fault to the CIA and the military?

He wanted to go after Bin Laden but the CIA refused to certify? Darn that CIA! The question comes up, though....wasn't he Commander in Chief??? Wasn't it his JOB...one of his sole purposes in life to be the final decision maker on things of that nature?

[JerseyDvl]

It is against the law for the President to interfere in CIA business and sanction an assassination. He should have been totally hands off in this regard but obviously he couldn't keep his hands off anything.
He admitted to another HIGH CRIME. What a total loser!
PS- I think he has been drinking.

[MagUSNRET]

YOu can back up further and blame the Church Commission for the CIA needing to be "100% certain" before the President would approve anything (eyes rolling)Yeah..thats a good spy program...make sure that nothing goes wrong EVER and I will sign off on it (Way to go Clinton, ya POS)

[BIGLOOK]

wasn't he Commander in Chief??? Wasn't it his JOB...one of his sole purposes in life to be the final decision maker on things of that nature?

Harry Truman said 'The buck stops here".

Clinton said "Yeah!' and whistled past the graveyard.

[plain talk]

The CIA refused to certify WHAT? Notice how he left that hanging ... so Clintonian. Perhaps the CIA could not certify absolutely 100% they could take out Bin Laden without endangering anyone else? I wonder precisely what he was asking the CIA to certify to?