Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mia T; Czar; Minuteman23
If we are to prevail, the rules of engagement--on both fronts--must change … Marquis of Queensberry niceties, multicultural hypersensitivity, unipolar-power guilt, hegemony aversion (which is self-sabotage in the extreme--we must capture what we conquer--oil is the terrorist's lifeblood)... and, most important, the mutual-protection racket in DC--pre-9/11 anachronisms all--are luxuries we can no longer afford.

Your 'The Democratic Party's Problem Transcends Its Anti-War Contingent', especially, is nothing short of brilliant.

I don't know how far from south-central PA you live, Mia, but if you’re within a couple hundred miles, I'm guessing you can hear the sound of uproarious cheering right about now.

God bless, uplift and strengthen modern patriots such as you.

A side note: I was forwarded a transcript of Keith Olbermann's recent tirade (on his MSNBC show 'Countdown'), entitled 'A Textbook Definition of Cowardice'. If you ever find yourself suffering from low blood pressure, take a gander. It's a genuine non-medicinal cure that is sure to raise your pressure readings by a good fifty percent.

I don't recall ever reading a political commentary more filled with venom, bias, and inaccuracy, in my entire (somewhat-consumed-with-reading) life.

After wading through the vicious, two-faced, factless, hate-filled, anti-American, borderline seditious diatribe, I sat at my keyboard last night in an attempt to write a rebuttal to post here on the forum.

After close to an hour of dealing with screaming into my computer monitor after each cut and paste, wasting precious sleep time wiping the spit off my keyboard, and being unable to focus on the words I had written (when one is seeing red, it strangely blurs the visual acuity and narrows the visual field), I resigned the task.

But I'm starting over again this morning. Never say die. :)

Rather than risk experiencing more of the above, let me just excerpt a few (of dozens of venomous) phrase(s) from Olbermann’s harangue (his words in bold, mine in brackets):

It is not essential that a past president [the apparently venerable Bill Clinton], bullied ['Why didn't you do more, connect the dots and put them [al-Qaeda] out of business?' ... a question respectfully and civilly asked by his interviewer] and sandbagged by a monkey posing as a newscaster [highly-respected FoxNews commentator, Chris Wallace, who, unlike Olbermann, makes a genuine attempt at unbiased news reporting/commentary, and never resorts to unfounded personal attacks] finally lashed back [launched into a crazed, borderline-psychotic diatribe would be more accurate].

Footnote: Somewhere else within this diatribe, he also passionately referred to Mr. Clinton as 'honest' and 'brave'. (You may pick yourself up off the floor now. Try to regain your composure. I have a little more to say ...)

Moreover, for the last five years one month and two weeks [apparently at least some leftist ideologues can count, but notice ... not beyond the digits contained on both hands], the current administration, and in particular the President, has been given the greatest "pass" for incompetence and malfeasance in American history [apparently Mr. Olbermann was in hibernation during the Decade of High Crimes, Treasons and Felonies].

To hear him [President Bush] bleat and whine and bully at nearly every opportunity ... [I no longer believe that Olbermann even watched the Wallace/Clinton interview ... otherwise he would at least subliminally recognize that he is accusing the man he is smearing of behaviors claimed nearly exclusively by the very man he is defending].

That [the abovementioned 'bleating and whining'] hardly reflects the honesty nor manliness we expect of the executive [insert my last bracketed comment in here as well, while simultaneously reflecting on the ‘manliness’ of the circumstances surrounding his defendee’s other notable finger-wagging rant, staged during the aforementioned Decade of High Crimes, Treasons and Felonies].

Mr. Bush has now moved, unmistakably and without conscience or shame, towards re-writing history [See Clinton's very own 'Rewriting History for Dummies']

As with all the other nefariousness and slime of this, our worst presidency since James Buchanan [See this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this … I could go on, but my monitor is running out of ink ...]

The kind of proof of incompetence, for which the [Bush] administration and its hyenas at Fox need to find a diversion, in a scapegoat [Diversion? Scapegoat? Was Olbermann indeed hibernating when our military made a habit of, among other expensive and deadly diversions, bombing camels in the desert in order to remove attention from misplaced cigars?]

... the Right Wingers ... who try to sneak it into our collective consciousness through entertainment … [I can’t even bring myself to rebut this ludicrous accusation. Oh heck, maybe I’ll give it a try. Four words: Fonda, Streisand, Sheen, Glover -- and that’s just the tiny tip of the entertainment-industry-conspiracy iceberg].

[In reference to right-wing propagandists’] To enforce the lies of the present, it is necessary to erase the truths of the past, and [quoting George Orwell], The [Republican] Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power... [No comment necessary].

~ joanie
Allegiance and Duty Betrayed

105 posted on 09/26/2006 9:20:46 AM PDT by joanie-f (If you believe that God is your co-pilot, it might be time to switch seats ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: joanie-f; Mia T
Keith Olbermann was a complete failure as a sports newsie/commentator. Since escaping the scene of that particular crime against sports fans everywhere, he has moved on to his present MSNBC slot where he is busy trying to persuade his tiny audience that he is a "serious journalist". Convinced that his anti-American diatribes will position him as a beloved member of the drive-by media, to be adored by the liberals who populate the elitist salons of Washington and New York, he is too arrogant to distinguish what appears to be a light at the end of the tunnel from what is actually an onrushing train. Doomed to failure once more, he is pulling out all the stops, spewing and directing his hatred at those who love America most.

It will be a pleasure to see this worthless excuse for an American crash and burn again.

106 posted on 09/26/2006 1:05:48 PM PDT by Czar ( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: joanie-f
Great work, Joanie.

Of your nine "this"'s I've only read one (Final Days). :-(

But I'll be picking up one or two of the others.

107 posted on 09/26/2006 1:55:12 PM PDT by Minuteman23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: joanie-f

Thank you, joanie. Great analysis.

(Keith Olbermann does the same thing to my blood pressure.) ;)

Does access journalism create Keith Olbermanns or do Keith Olbermanns create access journalism?

The Interview:

clinton is not nearly as smart as his PR would have us believe, he is prone to fits of rage and he didn't plan his public breakdown.

But he did plan to spin 9/11 (to us dummies) in response to "the little Pathway to 9/11." (NOTE: The misnomer by clinton was deliberate and meant to convey that he not only didn't watch the ABC movie, he paid it no notice.)

What the interview demonstrated: clinton is profoundly dysfunctional; he is a pathological liar, a thug, corrupt, consumed with roiling rage (of the rapist kind), paranoid, self-absorbed, developmentally arrested, inept, delusional, dangerous. (The wife is at least as bad.)

BTW, clinton's scapegoating of the 'neocons' is consistent with both clintons' latent antisemitism.


'BIN LADEN ALIVE TODAY BECAUSE CLINTON, BERGER + CLARKE REFUSED TO KILL HIM' :HEAR Osama-Division CIA Chief
CLINTON 'MISLED AMERICAN PEOPLE' IN CHRIS WALLACE INTERVIEW



108 posted on 09/26/2006 7:17:35 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: joanie-f

Relax.

Oberman's total worldwide audience numbers about 200,000 person. Of these 90% are institutionalized drooling alzheimers patients, prisoners, and people waiting for the next Greyhound to Ipsalanti.

Any dimwit with a college degree can can invent unsubstantiated slander and smugly deliver it as long as no one is allowed to cross examine the evidence or question the argument. The other 10% are committed elitist Leftists who think Oberman's dull wit is what passes for cutting edge political commentary.

Its a club for losers. Oberman is on his way to the bottom of his profession, whatever it is. MSNBC is a losing commercial venture running just behind Air America in its impact on politics.

If he continues to get to you just sign him up for some Nazi propaganda and marital aids catelgues, at his office address of course,


111 posted on 09/26/2006 7:53:25 PM PDT by Gail Wynand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson