Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TXBubba
This part is strange and perhaps justifies the ruling:
"That's all the better reason to reinsert 'console compartment, or some other similar compartment' back into the statute," Scott wrote. "But, that of course is not for us to do."
If the statute used to be written that way, but "console compartment, or some other similar compartment" was at some point removed from the wording then that is evidence that the legislature decided that a console compartment was not to be considered as a place for storing a weapon since they explicitly removed language saying just that from the law.
36 posted on 09/22/2006 12:58:37 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomCalls
Oh, that tears it. I'm gonna fire up LexisNexis and see what the hell is going on here.

Back in thirty to sixty.

39 posted on 09/22/2006 1:01:15 PM PDT by Gordongekko909 (Mark 5:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: FreedomCalls
Grr, scratch that. I can't find the KSC's published opinion yet. Just the Court of Appeals, which reversed the sane trial judge. Can be found here.
43 posted on 09/22/2006 1:10:31 PM PDT by Gordongekko909 (Mark 5:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson