Skip to comments.
Ky. Supreme Court Defines Where Guns Are Allowed In Vehicles
wave3.com ^
| Sep 21, 2006
| NA
Posted on 09/22/2006 12:23:01 PM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 last
To: TChris
With a bias toward common sense. Amen.
61
posted on
09/22/2006 2:09:04 PM PDT
by
JTHomes
To: ZULU
Because it appears the statute doesn't cover a console, unless the console has a lid or cover, some do, some don't.But that still doesn't make sense because having the gun laying on the seat is okay. I haven't seen any seats with lids. So, the purpose of the lid isn't even clear.
62
posted on
09/22/2006 2:12:54 PM PDT
by
TXBubba
( Democrats: If they don't abort you then they will tax you to death.)
To: neverdem
Interesting. Whether or not you break a law (and have your freedom deprived of you) depends on pricise meanings of phrases like "glove compartment".
It's hard to see the law as having anything to do with morality or safety. It's hard to respect it either.
Trafic tickets are just tolls. I can stop and proceed at a thousand red lights before I actually get a ticket. That is a CHEAP toll.
63
posted on
09/22/2006 2:14:39 PM PDT
by
RobRoy
(Islam is more dangerous to the world now that Naziism was in 1937.)
To: neverdem
Kentucky Supreme Court reinstated both charges... Double jeopardy?
64
posted on
09/22/2006 2:20:49 PM PDT
by
GingisK
To: GingisK; Congressman Billybob
Double jeopardy?SCOTUS kicks cases back to federal district courts on a routine basis, IIRC.
65
posted on
09/22/2006 2:40:56 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: Bigh4u2
Yah, I agree.
The intent of the law was clear, and clearly, the court didn't like the law.
To: Large
Thanks! Exactamundo!
This was always the left's game: Deflect the argument into something else. Look at all the posts here where people are debating what a glove box is. Irrelevant. The real question is why there is a law defining where a law-abiding person may carry a weapon at all. As far as I'm concerned if someone wants to drive around with a pistol in his lap: Have at it.
Gun control groups are nothing more than advocates for criminals. Every murder, robbery and rape committed by a CRIMINAL, not a weapon, needs to be layed at their feet.
67
posted on
09/22/2006 7:41:57 PM PDT
by
samm1148
(Pennsylvania-They haven't taxed air--yet)
To: ZULU
Guess I mistakenly thought Kentucky's Supreme Court was above picking nits.
68
posted on
09/22/2006 7:43:45 PM PDT
by
demkicker
(democrats, terrorists, Powell, McCain, Graham & Collins are intimate bedfellows)
To: TXBubba
Sounds like the statute or the judges are all screwed up - or both.
69
posted on
09/23/2006 1:53:12 AM PDT
by
ZULU
(Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson