[Coyoteman]

I see here that, by definition, an evolutionist could be called a religious fundamentalist.

Sorry, no. Science is based on facts and well-supported theory (see definitions, above).

It is dishonest to suggest otherwise, in a vain attempt to equate science with religion. The two fields are distinctly different in methods and results.

[LifeOrGoods?]

Sorry, no. Science is based on facts and well-supported theory (see definitions, above).

So in your unbiased opinion, religion cannot be based on fact. I think you may need to rethink your definition of the word faith.