You stand by calling the man a tax-and-spend Marxist because he happens to be the governor of one of the most (if not the most) liberal state governments in the United States? He has absolutely zero veto power. If Romney put forth a bill that simply said cookies are good, the General Court would oppose it on principle.
It's fine if you want to oppose a possible Romney presidential run, but at least have the common sense to oppose him for intelligent reasons. He's hardly a tax-and-spender, and he's hardly a Marxist.
"It's fine if you want to oppose a possible Romney presidential run, but at least have the common sense to oppose him for intelligent reasons. He's hardly a tax-and-spender, and he's hardly a Marxist."
Two words: socialized medicine. He's a tax-and-spender and a Marxist. Deal with it.