ofwaihhbtn : It is hard to argue with this theory. It is scientific and testable.
Dawkins was being polite. Anti-evos can also be cynical, wicked con artists, and can also exhibit several of these traits at once; eg. Kent Hovind is both dishonest and ill-educated (and may also show signs of mental diseases).
In fact, all one would have to do to falsify the statement is produce a single example of a smart, honest, educated-in-biology, sane, anti-evo. Good Luck!
Scientific and testable placemarker
ofwaihhbtn : It is hard to argue with this theory. It is scientific and testable.
Dawkins was being polite. Anti-evos can also be cynical, wicked con artists, and can also exhibit several of these traits at once; eg. Kent Hovind is both dishonest and ill-educated (and may also show signs of mental diseases).
In fact, all one would have to do to falsify the statement is produce a single example of a smart, honest, educated-in-biology, sane, anti-evo. Good Luck!
Who needs luck when there are useful idiots.
You just falsified the statement yourself by contradicting the grounds of the proposition.