[investigateworld]

Have you noticed that a lot of employers are requiring a hair sample for drug testing now?
Even though it is more expensive, the consensus is that a longer 'look' is needed at applicants.
It is the experience of employers that drug users have higher rates of Work Comp claims, absenteeism, property getting lost or stolen, and generally poor performance.
So folks who are in business and have to fight to stay in the game think the druggie crowd is not worth hiring.
As a free market is king amongst conservatives, does this give you a clue?

[Know your rights]

So folks who are in business and have to fight to stay in the game think the druggie crowd is not worth hiring.

Based on my experience, drug-testing employers are in a minority. Do you have experience or evidence to the contrary?

As a free market is king amongst conservatives, does this give you a clue?

Same question to you. And here's another one: Should the voluntary choices of SOME employers be forcibly imposed on ALL?