To: Mikey_1962
I'm not shocked that it's the Chrysler group is the one bringing everything down. I've heard Chrysler has improved since the merger, but they were such POS's to begin with, they have a lot of negatives to overcome.
9 posted on
09/15/2006 6:38:06 AM PDT by
Hoodlum91
(I've been rocked.)
To: Hoodlum91
Unfortunately, in the mid 1990s, when the company was making huge profits, Chrysler invested a large share of its profits on executive bonuses (many three times annual salary) rather than improving quality.
16 posted on
09/15/2006 7:10:32 AM PDT by
BW2221
To: Hoodlum91
I'm not shocked that it's the Chrysler group is the one bringing everything down. I've heard Chrysler has improved since the merger, but they were such POS's to begin with, they have a lot of negatives to overcome. Oh, I think Ford and GM have been building many more POS autos then Chrysler, with their quality and engineering severely lacking. I don't recall any SUV rollover problems or massive recalls plaguing Chrysler. I've had nothing but good luck with Chrysler since the early 90s. My wife's 95 Neon went to 190K miles before we sold it with no major problems. I think your opinion is colored at best.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson