[bonfire]

I would really love to see the Pres get ANGRY and let them have it. Please God!

[rintense]

Maybe he's going to reveal the valid intel we got from gitmo detainees in order to support stronger interrogation techniques.

[Cold Heat]

I don't think he will mention names, but he will certainly explain that they have made a fuss over nothin...

The intent of Common Article III appears to be based on each individual signers interpretation of what might be out of the norm for detainee interogation. It begs to be interpreted, and this is all they are asking for. (Using McStain's interpretation)

I heard Warren make the statement that SCOTUS would not agree with the interpretation. This is crappolla!

SCOTUS practically begged Congress to put in writing what article three means, because they did not think it their job to do so.

These Senators are trying to punt this back to the courts, in the middle, or possibly the beginning of a long conflict where our asses are on the line. They are angry with SCOTUS and the president fo making them work. They don't like their responsibilities being shoved at them and are trying to send a message but have brought a McCain to a Bush fight.

The vagueness of the language is impossible to work with. They will interpret it, or the House will do it.