I posted a fairly extensive list of things -- most of the things you eat -- that we would not have without evolution. Not just evolution, but applied evolution. These new crops and animals would not exist without evolution.
A list??? wow...weak...
A list of FOOD is your evidence of evolution!! Give me the gradual list of changes in the naimals...all you said was a LIST of animals!! Actually...don't write me again if you can't show me this gradual change in just ONE animal....P>S. Not a list.
Now js.
You're merely defining 'evolution' to be consistent with observations without admitting that the observations can also be explained in a creation model.
No unique observations supporting evolution-only means that you can't honestly do that.
That's disingenious.