[Virginia-American]

LOL ..show me where Darwin predicted the pre cambrian fossils.....

IIRC, it's in the "Origin", I don't have the precise reference handy

...this discovery is major evidence against Darwin!

Huh? In what way? Sometimes you see anti-evolutionists attempt to use the "Cambrian explosion" as evidence against standard biology - now you're saying preCambrian life is!

[RunningWolf]

Well I was hoping to see another artfully drawn evo flow diagram but even that is not on that link.

You should have seen the exhibits at all the big museums 40 to 30 years ago. Life-size panoramic vistas of the imagined 1million+old creatures, and then read parts of their 'thesis', and seen the shards of bone (off an African terrain) that gave form to their visions (yeah Leaky and the rest) And you just might have said .. whhaat?

And from that, you might even have begun to question the authority that academia grants itself.

W.

[caffe]

Perhaps you should question these so-called facts once in a while. Even Gould had to admit that the fossil record shows no trend toward increased complexity. "Most structural complexity entered in a grand burst at the Cambrian explosion, and the history of Phanerozoic life since then has largely been a tale of endless variation upon a set of basic body plans...So was'nt Darwin's theory based upon a clear progression from simple to complex? Try and find your evidence that the Cambrian explosion was predicted by Darwin....it remains one of the evolutionists biggest problems ...alas until we're now able to study biochemistry and see so much disturbing complexity. LOL