The TOE does make a lot of predictions like that. Most of which are never found. And much of what is found, is questionable. And often forced fit into what evolution predicted. Like skull 1470 being reconstructed out of 100 pieces to look like a man-ape with a flat face when it was just an ape with a sloping face.
Tiktaalik is indeed an excellent example. Did you perhaps miss all the threads debunking this as a missing link? And showing the simliarities to existing shallow water fish.
Put up or shut up. What are you talking about?
And much of what is found, is questionable
Show me the peer-reviewed questioning.
Tiktaalik is indeed an excellent example. Did you perhaps miss all the threads debunking this as a missing [sic - it's not missing] link? And showing the simliarities to existing shallow water fish.
The links don't work. Of course there are similarities to fish - but also to amphibians. Show some peer-reviewed evidence, not DI or AiG armchair speculation. The review is important because the creationist and ID advocacy groups have an extremely poor record when it comes to telling the truth.
BTW, it appears that you acknowledge that it was found where the ToE said it would be.