Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aussie Dasher
"We had an astonishing moment of unity," former President Clinton said Monday.

As usual, most of what Clinton says is absolute rubbish. After 9/11 a lot of Democrats kept their mouths shut because they knew that it would have been politically unwise to reveal their true (lack of) character.

But even then there were plenty of Demo/Commies who couldn't hold it in. I was in Manhattan at that time, and I remember distinctly, within just a couple of weeks of 9/11, while thousands of bodies were still being placed into refrigerated trucks acting as a makeshift morgue on the East side of Manhattan, there was a parade of America-hating ANSWER types and Demo/Commies streaming all the way from Central Park to Union Square holding up signs blaming the US and pleading for the US not to take the war to Afghanistan and the Taliban. There was no unity then, other than a cheap Democrat facade, and now those ANSWER type traitors clearly form the solid core of the Democrat constituency. They are the Lamont supporters, and they are the ones that Hillary is trying assiduously to court by kissing Lamont's rear end, all the while pretending to be Ms. Centrist...

10 posted on 09/11/2006 11:12:19 PM PDT by Zeppo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Zeppo


Thanks for your post!

I concur: Rat's had to shut up and present a face of unity. It was a false face of course.


12 posted on 09/11/2006 11:14:48 PM PDT by onyx (1 Billion Muslims -- IF only 10% are radical, that's still 100 Million who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Zeppo
"There was no unity then , other than a cheap Democrat facade"

"holding up signs blaming the US, and pleading for the US not to take the war to Afghanistan"

I recall traitor Ted Kennedy on the floor of the senate talking about the tens of thousands of body bags that would be needed- if we sent troops to Afghanistan-That the Taliban were superior fighters and that it would be a quagmire. I believe the rats were also issuing veiled threats that they wouldn't vote to fund Afghanistan- but then they backed off.

I believe it was Gore?- who came out within days after 9/11 and told us that we should ,first and foremost, ask ourselves what we did to make them so angry. And of course the rats begged us to let the UN handle it.

Come to think of it - someone should do a side by side comparison of rat comments about going to Afghanistan, and their comments about going to Iraq- they are almost identical-body bags, Quagmire, Viet Nam.

Wait.. wasn'tAfghanistan -according to the rats- a "quagmire" and "Viet Nam" about 3 days into the war? (arghhh!)

I agree there was never "unity" . There was only rats in hiding- for a few days- after 9/11.

Today they are back to their tear-the-country-apart, business as usual. Unfortunately.

21 posted on 09/12/2006 1:31:10 AM PDT by Pajamajan (Liberalism=suicide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Zeppo

Zeppo,

you are right.

The first peel-offs from 'unity' was the "Not in my Name" leftists, and Cong Barbara Lee, who opposed taking action against Bin Laden and the Taliban. They think we deserved the terrorist attack. This was within 2 weeks of the attack.


36 posted on 09/12/2006 7:02:55 AM PDT by WOSG (Broken-glass time, Republicans! Save the Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson