Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: staytrue

I for one agree; this (metals) has become a very crowded trade and a few funds have thrown in the towel. I'll separate oil from the metals, because IMO the fundamentals for oil very much outran the realities. I remain bullish on the metals but they will be a LT trade and they have demonstrated an unsuitability for more than say a single digit fraction of one's port. IMO, of course.

I truly do not understand the pump in the homies, though.


21 posted on 09/11/2006 9:24:38 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (You're never more than a half-step away from a good note.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Attention Surplus Disorder

"I truly do not understand the pump in the homies, though."

I truly do not understand the above sentence, can you translate please.

I have been following the oil prices for a while. Saw a TV program that said if it weren't for various manipulations, the true price of oil should be around $40 or $50. On the other hand I attended a conference on "peak oil" featuring Mr Lundberg of Lundberg Letter fame. There the projection was that because of growth in China and India, oil could reach $200/barrel in 5 or 10 years.


39 posted on 09/11/2006 9:37:09 AM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

truly do not understand the pump in the homies, though.
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

Fall in commodities= cheaper home const. costs.


82 posted on 09/11/2006 10:57:20 AM PDT by photodawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson