Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rwfromkansas

What they appear to have done is to insulate Clinton from most of the criticism. Instead, his underlings take the fall. Clinton is nowhere to be seen in the decisionmaking process.


2,114 posted on 09/10/2006 7:23:58 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2075 | View Replies ]


To: kabar

That was the case with the original anyway.

The writer of the movie has tried to focus on the bureacracy, not the president himself. About the only blame Clinton got originally anyway was the piece about Lewinsky, which stayed in, and not being able to locate him for the go-ahead.


2,170 posted on 09/10/2006 7:27:07 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2114 | View Replies ]

To: kabar

I don't think it insulates him, it makes it apparent that he wouldn't make decisions that could be traced to him. He left it to his appointees, who were terribly inept. And because of his methods our country was attacked and thousands of innocent people killed.


2,293 posted on 09/10/2006 7:36:30 PM PDT by pepperdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson