Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Just mythoughts

It's not my math, but the answer is yes. The scientific search for evidence of a global flood rapped up around 1830 -- long before Darwin.

If it happened it didn't leave evidence.


152 posted on 09/12/2006 11:16:56 AM PDT by js1138 (Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: js1138
If it happened it didn't leave evidence.

I didn't know that according to creation science, ice melts and generates a greater volume of water than the volume of the ice itself.

153 posted on 09/12/2006 11:21:04 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Where are the anachronistic fossils? Where are the moderate creationists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

To: js1138

I am surprised that 1830 is when 'scientific search" ended given that global warming scientists seem to be in fear of melting polar ice.

If the surface of this earth were level seems there would be a different calculation required. Driving through various parts of this country alone one can visible see layers of deposits lifted from where they once were.


154 posted on 09/12/2006 11:22:26 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

To: js1138
>The scientific search for evidence of a global flood rapped up around 1830 -- long before Darwin. If it happened it didn't leave evidence.

My non-scientist
thoughts are that if Pangia
was still together

in Noah's time then
it's easier to picture
a flood affecting

the entire world and
the subsequent moves apart
(in Peleg's life time?)

would have confounded
the "record" of the flood with
the breakup record.

171 posted on 09/12/2006 1:14:19 PM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson