Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EQAndyBuzz
There is a reason. The leftwing needed validation. This was it.

What? Validation that they can support a candidate into the ground?

They can take down any of their candidates at any given time.

They didn't "take down" Leiberman. He's going to win, BIG.

I'm sorry, but you aren't making much sense here.

20 posted on 09/09/2006 12:27:06 PM PDT by TomB ("The terrorist wraps himself in the world's grievances to cloak his true motives." - S. Rushdie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: TomB

"What? Validation that they can support a candidate into the ground?"

This is politics. In my opinion, they were teaching Joe a lesson not to stray to far. Lamont winning is not good for Hillary in 2008. They get the same results with Lieberman who is more moderate.

"They didn't "take down" Leiberman. He's going to win, BIG."

I said Lieberman was going to win, big. The primary was a message from the left to any moderate Dem who has an idea to side with the Bush camp. Lieberman was made an example.


23 posted on 09/09/2006 3:14:35 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Mediacrat - A leftwing editorialist who pretends to be an objective journalist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson