As you know the OECD is an intergovernmental organization, which, clearly isn't the same as a rotary club, or chamber of commerce. As an intergovernmental organization,members are appointed, you cannot 'join' like a citizen would join a rotary club or a businessman would join the chamber of commerce. Since one of their stated goals is to 'harmonize national policies', it is clearly an anti-sovereignty organization, and no US official or appointed representative should have anything to do with it. Sadly, though this group has widespread influence and participates in functions that have an effect on US citizens, their country and their government.
The "free traitin'" globalists say that the group has no influence, but then its work is generally out of public view, and as the 'working groups' put together to form the NAU, the organization is
"designed to avoid public scrutiny and to maintain "deniability"".
Any LOYAL American would question US participation in such a group. In fact its existence is an abhorrence to the American system of government, as it is an enabling tool for corrupt officials to promote their anti-American agenda and consolidate their political ideology in the global arena.
So let's see . . . if a couple of businesses get together to harmonize, say, their preference for one tax program over another, they have given up their "sovereignty?" In other words, they are no longer capable of acting in their own individual best interest?