Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj

Actually, if Wendell Wilkie had won in 1940 he would have approched the war like FDR did. Wilkie was not IIRC an isolationist at all.


34 posted on 09/08/2006 5:32:16 AM PDT by GreenLanternCorps (The Solution to the GOP's Problems Isn't More Democrats!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: GreenLanternCorps; Clintonfatigued; AuH2ORepublican; Kuksool; Torie

From what I understood of Willkie, he was initially thought of as an isolationist, and later claimed to be a non-interventionist. Prior to the '40 election, he charged FDR with being a "warmonger." Eventually, he came around to embrace most of FDR's positions (before he died, he left the Republican Party to found the NY Liberal Party, which was created to supplant the Communist-infested NY American Labor Party). Interesting that despite his relatively youthful age when he ran (48), he would not have lived to see the end of the Presidential term, and his running mate, Sen. Charles McNary, both died in 1944 (McNary in February, Willkie, just 3 weeks before the November elections). It surely would've been a politically tumultous year, as Speaker Sam Rayburn would've become President with a vacancy in both offices (and I have no idea whom the Democrats would've put up in '44, as FDR probably would not have been physically up to mounting a rematch campaign).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendell_Willkie


35 posted on 09/08/2006 8:07:24 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson