To: CedarDave
Are Clinton and his cronies complaining because it isn't 110% favorable to his legacy? Or am I reading this all wrong? I can not believe Oliver Stone and Al Gore sycophants would endorse the film if it portrayed the Clinton years in an unfavorable light.
---
Yes, Billy Jeff is pissed because this brings into question his legacy as the greatest president of the 20th AND 21st centuries (January 1st through the 19th, 2001 were in the 21st century. And in his mind no one could ever match him for the rest of the century.)
I don't know about Oliver Stone, but just because he's a leftist doesn't mean he likes Bubba.
As for Algore, remember that the Presidential candidate normally has a great deal on influence in his party even if he loses, so Gore should have a lot of say in how the Democratic Party was run after 2000. He was ignored and shut out by the Clintons. This might be payback time.
The next ten days could be very interesting. I know that a lot of FReepers have come to believe that Billy Jeff will never get what he deserves for his years of misrule, and I tended to believe it myself. Maybe, just maybe, the first installment of retribution is now coming due.
53 posted on
09/05/2006 7:07:43 PM PDT by
Cheburashka
(World's only Spatula City certified spatula repair and maintenance specialist!!!)
To: All; Cheburashka; reformjoy; Richard Poe; doug from upland; RonDog; Mia T; AnnaZ; Calpernia; ...
.
NEVER FORGET
KFI 640-AM Los Angeles Radio's JOHN ZIEGLER is reporting tonight that BERGER & ALBRIGHT have been calling ABC-TV for changes in the final version of this 9/11 exposee for the last week. And that they succeeded twice..!!
The 1st change came when ABC took out the 'Based on the 9/11 Commission Report' part of this program's advance TV Commerical promotions.
The 2nd change edited out was BERGER's pulling all our Agents out of Afghanistan during the 1990's.
A BERGER who was the contact man for CLINTON's 3 refusals to bring OSAMA bin LADEN here when freely offered the CLINTON White House by the Sudan during the 1990's. This per the man who personally arranged these 3 OSAMA offers, MONSOOR IJAZ, who shared all this on the Fox News Channel to a stunned nation on September 12, 2001. In the nodding in agreement presence of former CLINTON CIA Chief JAMES WOOLSEY..!!!
A BERGER who also was the Chief Washington, D.C. Lobbyist for COMMUNIST CHINA before being made National Security Advisor by a CLINTON that was on the side of Communist North Vietnam, and against US, during the Vietnam War..!!!
The Enemy is now Within,
...and always has been,
...STILL..!!!
Signed:.."ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer
Veteran-1st Major Battles for Freedom of the Vietnam War, 1965-66
http://www.lzxray.com/guyer_collection.htm
NEVER FORGET
.
58 posted on
09/05/2006 8:42:15 PM PDT by
ALOHA RONNIE
("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.comr)
To: Cheburashka; All
I think you may be onto something. The true leftists have nothing but disdain for the clintons....
Most democrats don't want a hillary candidacy in '08....
Most people--and this includes Hollywood--don't want 'clinton-the sequel.' (Self-preservation trumps politics.)
UNITED 93:THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS "We have to do it now. We know what happens if we just sit here and do nothing...."
CLINTON: 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?' (+ Albright-Fulbright-Nobel TERRORISM revelations)
WHY DID BILL CLINTON IGNORE TERRORISM? Was it simply the constraints of his liberal mindset, or was it something even more threatening to our national security?
IT TAKES A CLINTON TO RAZE A COUNTRY
BIN LADEN FINGERS CLINTON FOR TERROR SUCCESS (SEE FOOTAGE) THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE
UNITED 93:THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS "We have to do it now. We know what happens if we just sit here and do nothing...."
ALBRIGHT INDICTS CLINTON FOR TERRORISM FAILURE (and doesn't even know it)
MISSING CLINTON AUDIO! 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?' (+Albright-Fulbright-Nobel TERRORISM revelations)
WHY THE CLINTONS FAILED "TO CAPTURE OR KILL THE TALLEST MAN IN AFGHANISTAN" (DID THEY REALLY WANT TO TAKE HIM OUT ANYWAY?)
'MAKE IT A RULE' -- PLACE YOUR ORDER FOR OSAMA WITH CLINTON and CO. (HEAR HILLARY + BILL MAKE THEIR PITCH)
THE (oops!) INADVERTENT (TERRORISM) ADMISSIONS OF BILL + HILLARY CLINTON (HEAR HILLARY IN SF)
HILLARY GOES NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION IN THE AGE OF CLINTON
THE FAILED, DYSFUNCTIONAL CLINTON PRESIDENCY (DECONSTRUCTING CLINTON'S HOFSTRA SPEECH) -- part1: clinton's "Brinkley" Lie
AFTERWORD: ON CLINTON SMALLNESS (BRINKLEY MISSES THE POINT)
PRESIDENTIAL FAILURE, 9/11 + KATRINA
Carpe Mañana: The (bill + hillary) clinton Terrorism Policy ('Can we kill 'em tomorrow?')
CHENEY: CALL THEM REPREHENSIBLE THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES5
sandy berger haberdashery feint (the specs, not the pants or the socks)
CLINTON TREASON + THE GORELICK WALL
Reverse Gorelick
THE LEFT'S RECKLESS TET-OFFENSIVE-GAMBIT REPLAY: the left's jihad against America is killing our troops, aiding + abetting the terrorists and imperiling all Americans
CLINTON RAPES, REVISIONISM, USEFUL IDIOTS AND ENTROPY (an update)
pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic WHY THE LEFT IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA
The Left's Fatally Flawed "Animal Farm" Mentality (Why America Must NEVER AGAIN Elect a Democrat President)
WAR AND TREASON AND THE NEW YORK TIMES (Please see post 65)
IN A 'PINCH': RETHINKING THE FIRST AMENDMENT (Which came first, the 'journalist' or the traitor?)
PINCH SULZBERGER, PEARL HARBOR + TREASON WHY WE MUST PROSECUTE THE NEW YORK TIMES
WHY BIN LADEN WANTS HOME DELIVERY OF THE NEW YORK TIMES
MORE
|
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006
63 posted on
09/06/2006 6:33:04 AM PDT by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson