Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 8mmMauser
More admiration for Crist...

......................

Crist defied the conventional wisdom for how to win a Republican primary. He did not, as almost every moderate Republican in the past has done -- as Tom Gallagher did this time -- pander to the feed-Terri Schiavo crowd.

No, he would not intervene in that fiasco.

No, he would not force raped women to bear their attackers' children.

No, he would not pander to homophobia. When Gallagher hammered away at gay unions, Crist shrugged him off by saying, "Live and let live."

He tapped into the silent majority of fiscally conservative, socially moderate Republicans who are tired of seeing these issues dredged up every campaign.

Dems' turmoil clears path for 'Teflon' Charlie

8mm

43 posted on 09/07/2006 3:48:37 AM PDT by 8mmMauser (Jezu ufam Tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: 8mmMauser

Harris will win, Crist will lose. That's my two bits.


44 posted on 09/07/2006 3:56:46 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: All
Followup to yesterday's story by Nat Hentoff on Terri's Legacy...

..................

It has been a great disappointment to me that the Schiavo case did not produce a movement for the protection of the lives of the disabled. I am disappointed in the GOP especially (I long ago gave up on Democrats pursuing a worthy cause) for not re-visting the issue given the Courts' unconstitutional refusal to comply with the provisions of an Article III enactment to prohibit States from killing people absent a de novo federal review. Convicted murderers have more protection.

And so it is with great pleasue that I see that the famous liberal editor of the Village Voice, Nat Hentoff, has refused to let Schiavo's memory die. Hentoff is a true believer, and on issues of protections in the court system, he is a true consistent champion.

Thanks to Nat, who recounts the strong case for Schiavo, especially the fact that she was not terminal, was breathing on her own and that there simply is no justification for refusing someone food and water in the circumstances then and there prevailing.

This was not a "right to die case." It was a disability-rights case, which I also argued at the time.

read the whole thing

http://washingtontimes.com/op-ed/nhentoff.htm

Honorable Liberal Revisits Schiavo case

8mm

45 posted on 09/07/2006 3:57:02 AM PDT by 8mmMauser (Jezu ufam Tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: 8mmMauser

There's a really gay/not gay? looking photo in today's Tampa Tribune. It's probably not going to be on the internet. I can scan it if I ever feel like it.


67 posted on 09/07/2006 8:26:54 AM PDT by floriduh voter (www.conservative-spirit.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: 8mmMauser

Euthanasia, baby-killing, and the coerced endorsement of deviant sexuality are not "moderate."

Unless you call extreme evil moderate.


638 posted on 09/18/2006 6:45:14 AM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson