[jwalsh07]

Your term "multicelled human organisms" is new to this thread and is quite distinct from your earlier claim that a blastosphere is "a" human and therefore deserves the same moral and legal protections as an actual human being.

It would be even more fruitful if you stopped dissembling. My claim is as it ever was. Embryo's are human beings at that stage of human beinghood. Don't attribute your inadequacies to me pal. You obviously don't understand the difference between organs and organisms because you persist in making flase analogies between the two.

Oh, and one other thing. You wrote above that I should not be responded to and yet here you are responding. LOL.

You're a sophist and a poor one at that. I have to go earn some sheckels now but I look forward to illuminating your brand of sophistry at every chance I get. Adios!

[jas3]

It would be even more fruitful if you stopped dissembling. My claim is as it ever was. Embryo's are human beings at that stage of human beinghood. Don't attribute your inadequacies to me pal. You obviously don't understand the difference between organs and organisms because you persist in making flase analogies between the two.

Oh, and one other thing. You wrote above that I should not be responded to and yet here you are responding. LOL.

You're a sophist and a poor one at that. I have to go earn some sheckels now but I look forward to illuminating your brand of sophistry at every chance I get. Adios!

Your reply is again confusing and less than illuminating.

Embryo's may be human beings at that stage of human beinghood, but so is an egg and so is a sperm, and for that matter if you believe in evolution, so is whatever came before human beings. My point is that you are arbitrary in your temporal definition of what is and what is not a human

I have no idea at all what you mean by "attribute [my] inadequacies to [you] pal."

Was that intended as another insult, or did you have some specific point to make there?

Oh, and one other thing. You wrote above that I should not be responded to and yet here you are responding. LOL.

You're a sophist and a poor one at that. I have to go earn some sheckels now but I look forward to illuminating your brand of sophistry at every chance I get. Adios!

Perhaps you are also confused by what I have posted? Or perhaps you have me confused with another poster? In which post do you claim that I said you should not be responded to?

jas3