To: jas3
Implanting an embryo is neither "natural" nor "supernatural", and those words are not antonyms.???? What's the point? The argument you and bambam are making is a stupid one. Open heart surgery isn't a "natural" process in your book either. And yet the patient on entry to the OR is both viable and in need of a heart transplant to retain that viability. Is the patient not viable or the victim of artificial, unnatural or supernatural practices?
To: jwalsh07
Implanting an embryo is neither "natural" nor "supernatural", and those words are not antonyms.
???? What's the point?
The point is that you claimed that a IVF is a natural process BECAUSE it is not "supernatural". And I noted that just because something is not supernatural does not make it natural. Artificial strawberry flavoring is not supernatural; it is also not natural. Do you understand why your reasoning is flawed that IVF is "natural" because it is not "supernatural" ?
The argument you and bambam are making is a stupid one. Open heart surgery isn't a "natural" process in your book either.
But in the case of open heart surgery, the operation is being performed on a human being. That open heart surgery is not "natural" does not make embryo implantation "natural".
jas3
424 posted on
09/05/2006 8:50:21 AM PDT by
jas3
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson