Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: saganite
The shuttle programme began to be wound down, aspirations for the International Space Station were scaled back......

Can someone please tell me the point of that Tom Joad shitwagon? Is it a floating tree house designed to help us hang out with a couple of Russians? I currently live in Huntsville Alabama which is where the Marshall Space Flight Center and the US Space and Rocket Center is located. I have several friends that work in the industry and I can't get a straight answer to my question. I get a lot of BS answers about testing the effects of space on this or that substance, but that's it. Nothing has come of it so far as I can tell.

And I don't know what we've spent all the billions upon billions on. The International Space Station is so low-rent, the only thing missing is a pink flamingo and a clothes dryer on the porch.
3 posted on 09/02/2006 6:00:13 PM PDT by Jaysun (Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jaysun

You can pretty much ignore anything NASA related in this post as they won't accomplish anything mentioned. The real news is the private sector moving into space in a big way.


4 posted on 09/02/2006 6:02:41 PM PDT by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Jaysun
I get a lot of BS answers about testing the effects of space on this or that substance, but that's it. Nothing has come of it so far as I can tell.

Those things are important but I agree that we need to see some results.

Personally I think we should be working on shielding against radiation for longer duration missions outside the cocoon.
5 posted on 09/02/2006 6:09:35 PM PDT by cripplecreek (If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Jaysun
Is it a floating tree house designed to help us hang out with a couple of Russians?

What does the ISS have that the Shuttle doesn't, aside from larger stores of habitation supplies and generators?

6 posted on 09/02/2006 6:11:23 PM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Jaysun
Can someone please tell me the point of that Tom Joad ****wagon? Is it a floating tree house designed to help us hang out with a couple of Russians? I currently live in Huntsville Alabama which is where the Marshall Space Flight Center and the US Space and Rocket Center is located. I have several friends that work in the industry and I can't get a straight answer to my question. I get a lot of BS answers about testing the effects of space on this or that substance, but that's it. Nothing has come of it so far as I can tell.

No need for vulgarities.

The ISS does serve some purposes, but it certainly isn't worth the ~$100 billion lifetime development cost. The research and engineering knowhow that it will teach probably isn't worth more than $5 billion. To summarize the ~$5 billion usefulness of the ISS: it teaches us how to build and assemble complex 10-20 ton life-support components that are launched into space with with about 3 Gs of force. This is certainly important, but overrated. It serves three purposes: 1) it helps us with our next generation of 20 ton component space stations (perhaps around the Moon or Mars), 2) it gives us a little technical knowhow if we want to start launching 100 ton components with a 5 G rocket, and 3) it gives us a little knowledge on how to make a life support compartment for an interplanetary mission.

It is useful to acknowledge that when the Ares V program comes online, the US will no longer be required to play with 10 shuttle flights to assemble and provide supplies for 8 15-ton components. A 130 ton (or optionally higher) Ares V rocket could do that in one launch. The final mass of the ISS, for example, could be put up with 3 Ares V rockets. The biggest winners from the ISS program will be the Russians and the Europeans--the ones who are paying less than half the cost.

12 posted on 09/02/2006 6:33:31 PM PDT by burzum (Despair not! I shall inspire you by charging blindly on!--Minsc, BG2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Jaysun

NASA has become welfare for engineers and managers.

Disband it, use the money for prizes (like in the early days of aviation) for demonstrated accomplishment by private groups.


27 posted on 09/02/2006 9:08:29 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Jaysun

It's a kum-bi-yah, diversity in action, wet dream, just as it was intended to be in the first place.

It hasn't produced anything worthwhile that required a crewed station, and primarily was a taxpayer subsidy for the Russian space program. We need to pull the plug now, since the Russians are making loads of cash off their hydrocarbon sales, and selling rifle factories and advanced fighters to Venezuela.

But we won't.


42 posted on 09/03/2006 4:36:46 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Saturday, September 2, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson