Posted on 09/02/2006 5:39:43 PM PDT by saganite
Can you believe what the pork-barrelers are doing to the NASA-funded competitive prizes program?
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/cpquery/?&dbname=cp109&sid=cp109s0tv8&refer=&r_n=sr280.109&item=&sel=TOC_385521&
"The Committee does not provide any funding in fiscal year 2007 for the Centennial Challenges program. Funding provided in previous fiscal years for this program is sufficient for NASA to run a prize based competition, as
well as to verify that NASA will see tangential benefits from running such a program. Providing additional funds to a program based on prizes only creates a pot of unused funds while other aspects of NASA's mission are
being cut or delayed due to a lack of funds."
Discussed here:
http://www.spacepolitics.com/archives/001028.html
and indirectly here: http://www.spaceprojects.com/prizes
It's a kum-bi-yah, diversity in action, wet dream, just as it was intended to be in the first place.
It hasn't produced anything worthwhile that required a crewed station, and primarily was a taxpayer subsidy for the Russian space program. We need to pull the plug now, since the Russians are making loads of cash off their hydrocarbon sales, and selling rifle factories and advanced fighters to Venezuela.
But we won't.
>>>the Russians are...selling rifle factories and advanced fighters to Venezuela<<<
This is most unfortunate. Chavez is a problem.
So is Putin.
Both Putin and Chavez want to remain in power indefinitely, and have tried to modify the laws accordingly. Chavez's push is reportedly underway right now (through a referendum).
Chavez's push s/b down an elevator shaft.
Before you do that Spin off JPL and let them run the unmanned planetary exploration program. Those guys do a great job there.
Yeah, if they're the ones doing the mini-probes and such, that's not unreasonable. Mostly I'm talking about the Shuttle fleet, and manned efforts in general.
The United States is the leader for construction of the ISS, but Americans will probably hand over much control over the stations to the other members (Russia and the ESA mainly, but Japan and Canada are also members), as NASA tries to go on with Bush's vision for space exploration.
See comment 52.
> How come the article has ESA, but uses Nasa?
My Conspiracy Theory Of The Day: it's subtle psyops. Same as news articles that refer to President Clinton out bopping around, and meeting with Mr. Bush.
I certainally hope that the ship is being built by Mr. Rutan. I wouldn't want to ride in a ship built by a guy who's company is known for "Blue Screen of Death", lock-ups, crashes and 5 minute boot times. :-/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.