Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Plamegate Hall of Shame
The Weekly Standard ^ | 09/11/2006, Volume 011, Issue 48 | Fred Barnes

Posted on 09/02/2006 7:23:23 AM PDT by Laverne

The rogues' gallery of those who acted badly in the CIA "leak" case turns out to be different from what the media led us to expect. Note that we put the word "leak" in quotation marks, because it's clear now there was no leak at all, just idle talk, and certainly no smear campaign against Joseph Wilson for criticizing President Bush's Iraq policy. It's as if a giant hoax were perpetrated on the country--by the media, by partisan opponents of the Bush administration, even by several Bush subordinates who betrayed the president and their White House colleagues. The hoax lingered for three years and is only now being fully exposed for what it was. Let's start at the top of the rogues' list:

* Richard Armitage, the deputy secretary of state under Colin Powell, was the first to reveal that Wilson's wife was a CIA employee. He blabbed carelessly to Bob Woodward of the Washington Post, then to columnist Robert Novak, who mentioned it in a July 2003 column. Armitage, after admitting this to the FBI in October 2003, stood by silently year after year as Vice President Cheney, Cheney's chief of staff Scooter Libby, Karl Rove, and other White House officials were blamed for what he had done, and President Bush suffered politically. Loyalty is not Armitage's strong suit.

* Colin Powell, Bush's friend and secretary of state in the first Bush term, knew what Armitage had done and never let on. He met with Bush countless times as the White House was being pummeled in the media and by Demo crats for outing a CIA agent to take revenge on her husband. Bush called publicly for the leaker to be identified. Powell knew the identity, but remained silent. Some friend.

* Patrick Fitzgerald, the special prosecutor in the "leak" case, was aware of the source of Novak's story when he began his still-ongoing investigation in December 2003. Yet finding that source was supposedly the object of his probe. Now working with a second grand jury, Fitzgerald surely knows the supposed conspiracy to defame Wilson is (and always was) a fantasy. Still he won't let go. Fitzgerald has proved once more why naming a special prosecutor is a colossal mistake.

* The Ashcroft Justice Department. Armitage brought his story to investigators after the CIA requested an investigation when the name of Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, appeared in Novak's column. So when the department decided weeks later to appoint a special prosecutor, it already knew who had "leaked" Plame's name. Attorney General John Ashcroft recused himself, leaving the decision to his deputy, James Comey. Rather than face a torrent of partisan recriminations for dropping the case, Comey passed the buck to Fitzgerald. There were no profiles in courage at Justice.

* Joseph Wilson, an ex-ambassador and National Security Council official in the Clinton and Bush I administrations, sparked the "leak" controversy in the first place by writing in the New York Times that Bush had lied in his 2003 State of the Union address about Saddam Hussein's seeking uranium in Africa for nuclear weapons. The CIA had sent Wilson to Niger in 2002 to check out precisely that point, and he claimed to have debunked it. Later, the Senate Intelligence Committee concluded that nearly everything Wilson wrote or said about Bush, Cheney, Iraq, and his own trip to Africa was untrue. Wilson was a fraud. "It's unfortunate that so many people took him seriously," the Washington Post editorialized sorrowfully last week.

* The media--especially the Washington Post and New York Times--relied heavily on Wilson's reckless and unfounded charges to wage journalistic jihad against the White House and Bush political adviser Karl Rove. Reporters and columnists, based on little more than Joe Wilson's harrumphing, bought the line that the White House "leaked" Plame's name to discredit her husband. In an editorial last January, the New York Times said the issue in the case "was whether the White House was using this information in an attempt to silence Mrs. Wilson's husband, a critic of the Iraq invasion, and in doing so violated a federal law against unmasking a covert operative." The paper's answer was yes.

So instead of Cheney or Rove or Libby, the perennial targets of media wrath, the Plamegate Hall of Shame consists of favorites of the Washington elite and the mainstream press. The reaction, therefore, has been zero outrage and minimal coverage. The appropriate step for the press would be to investigate and then report in detail how it got the story so wrong, just as the New York Times and other media did when they reported incorrectly that WMD were in Saddam's arsenal in Iraq. Don't hold your breath for this.

Not everyone got the story wrong. The Senate Intelligence Committee questioned Wilson under oath. It found that, contrary to his claims, his wife had indeed arranged for the CIA to send him to Niger in 2002. It found that his findings had not, contrary to Wilson's claim, circulated at the highest levels of the administration. And Bush's 16 words in the State of the Union to the effect that British intelligence believed Saddam had sought uranium in Africa--words Wilson insisted were fictitious--had been twice confirmed as true by none other than the British government.

Worse, Wilson failed in the single reason for his trip to Niger: to ferret out the truth about whether Iraq had sought uranium there. Wilson said no, dismissing a visit by Iraqis in 1999. But journalist Christopher Hitchens learned the trade mission was led by an important Iraqi nuclear diplomat. And uranium, of course, was the only thing Niger had to trade.

The fascination in Washington with the idea of a White House conspiracy to ruin Plame's career and punish Wilson never made sense. If there had been one, it had to be the most passive conspiracy in history. The suspected mastermind was Rove, the Bush political adviser. But all Rove did was to acknowledge off-handedly to two reporters that he'd heard that Wilson's wife, whose name he didn't know, was a CIA employee. And the two reporters were more likely to agree with Wilson about the war in Iraq than with the Bush administration. The conspiracy charge, the Post rightly concluded, was "untrue."

A few diehards in the media have tried to keep the conspiracy notion alive. Michael Isikoff of Newsweek asserts that what Armitage did and what Rove did were separate, and thus a White House smear campaign could still have gone on. Yes, but it didn't. Jeff Greenfield of CNN recalled a Post story in September 2003 that said "two top White House officials" had contacted six reporters "and disclosed the identity and occupation of Wilson's wife." But the Post itself has in effect repudiated this dubious story.

What's left to do? Fitzgerald, in decency, should terminate his probe immediately. And he should abandon the perjury prosecution of Libby, the former Cheney aide. Libby's foggy memory was no worse than that of Armitage, who forgot for two years to tell Fitzgerald he'd talked to the Post's Woodward but isn't being prosecuted. Last but not least, a few apologies are called for, notably by Powell and Armitage, but also by the press. A correction--perhaps the longest and most overdue in the history of journalism--is in order.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cialeak; colin; colinpowell; fitzygate; fredbarnes; plamebroiled; plamegate; powell; shamegate; wilsondone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
To: Laverne

Very well written column.
BUMP


41 posted on 09/02/2006 8:18:45 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laverne

I hope this blows to smithereens any hopes of that Plame/Wilson "book deal". Does anyone know the status of that?


42 posted on 09/02/2006 8:19:18 AM PDT by khnyny (Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few.- Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laverne
Note that we put the word "leak" in quotation marks, because it's clear now there was no leak at all, just idle talk, and certainly no smear campaign against Joseph Wilson for criticizing President Bush's Iraq policy.

This is exactly what conservatives have said about this since the whole kerfuffle began. It's long past due that the MSM, with all its "professional journalists" finally caught up to us.

And they wonder why they are losing subscribers and viewers at a record pace. We could tell them . . . . . .
43 posted on 09/02/2006 8:20:53 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: griswold3

[A dhimmicratic pundit was asked about this last night and said the facts proved nothing. (WTF??) That this administration was still engaged in politics of personal destruction. (Just name me one)]

Along the lines of cBS's "fake, but accurate"?


44 posted on 09/02/2006 8:23:52 AM PDT by khnyny (Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few.- Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: griswold3
A dhimmicratic pundit was asked about this last night and said the facts proved nothing.

The new DNC/media spin is that Rove/Cheney/Libby had already done their damage maliciously leaking Plame's name, so Armitage's leak was just an innocent little mistake with no harm intended and no damage done. They're not going to toss Armitage to the sharks - he's their pal, a fixture on the DC cocktail party circuit that makes up the universe they all dwell in.

45 posted on 09/02/2006 8:24:54 AM PDT by CFC__VRWC (AIDS, abortion, euthanasia - Don't liberals just kill ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: khnyny
I hope this blows to smithereens any hopes of that Plame/Wilson "book deal". Does anyone know the status of that?

It will be printed as a false but accurate novel. Dan Rather will write the intro...

46 posted on 09/02/2006 8:26:47 AM PDT by Loud Mime (An undefeated enemy is still an enemy.......war has a purpose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Laverne

Internal Enemies Device.

When will Richard (I'm such a Dick) Armitage and his co-conspirators be held accountable?

No Controlling Legal Authority (right Dan Rather?)


47 posted on 09/02/2006 8:30:01 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laverne
The whole thing stinks, and I look forward to the announcement that charges are dropped and Libby will file a defamation of character lawsuit against Armitage, the media, etc.

If he does, I hope he doesn't stop there and goes after Fitzgerald for malicious prosection. Fitzgerald should be disbarred and stripped of his law license, and should never set foot in a court room again, except as a defendant.

48 posted on 09/02/2006 8:31:46 AM PDT by CFC__VRWC (AIDS, abortion, euthanasia - Don't liberals just kill ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Laverne

Informative article by Fred Barnes. I wonder if Fitzgerald's knowledge that Libby was not the leaker and proceeded to investigate him anyway falls under the legal charge of entrapment. I hope the Bush administration smart guys have a plan in progress to turn this 3 years of deceit and lying into a wholesale indictment, on any kind of legal grounds, of all of the participants involved. Let the RATS and their extended media families twist and turn and run up huge legal fees, guilty or not. Probably just wishful thinking on my part but I do not understand the subtleties of turning the other cheek for these notorious liar's. This is political gamesmanship and turn about is certainly warranted. Republicans gain nothing from playing the role of the aggrieved and put upon.


49 posted on 09/02/2006 8:35:15 AM PDT by mountainfolk (God bless President George Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laverne

Fitzgerald owes the American taxpayers HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS in back pay.
Fitzgerald spent years and a HUGE PAYROLL "investigating" what any beat cop in America could have determined in a day. Valerie Plame was NOT A COVERT CIA AGENT at the time of the "outing" and has now been revealed, Fitzgerald has known for three years who was responsible for the "outing."

The MSM, the Lefties, Valerie Plame and Joe Wilson owe GWB, VP Cheney, Scooter Libbey, the GOP, America & Americans an APOLOGY.

But we won't be holding our collective breath.


50 posted on 09/02/2006 8:36:21 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eureka!
That Powell and Armitage would stand silent and let the presstitutes and rats take down W during war is really hard to fathom.

At one time I respected these two men. No longer.

51 posted on 09/02/2006 8:38:31 AM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("Fake but Accurate": NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Laverne
My prediction: an Op-Ed piece, written by Armitage, will appear withing the next week or so in the WAPO or NY Times. It will be a carefully constructed piece that will enumerate several legal and moral reasons why he could not come forth.

And it will be bunkum.

52 posted on 09/02/2006 8:42:46 AM PDT by Pharmboy (Every single day provides at least one new reason to hate the mainstream media...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laverne

Good article, but I would move Joe & Valerie Wilson to the top of this rouges list. The Wilsons started the entire campaign of lies with a fantasy editorial in the NYT.


53 posted on 09/02/2006 8:46:02 AM PDT by PogySailor (Media bias? What media bias?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend; All

That's right .. the drive-by will never admit their FRAUD - they will simply ignore it.

But .. they have forgotten there is an internet and talk radio to combat their treachery .. the drive-by can no longer FORGET about publishing certain issues and expect the world will never hear about it.


54 posted on 09/02/2006 8:46:47 AM PDT by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Laverne
...fake but accurate
55 posted on 09/02/2006 8:47:02 AM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("Fake but Accurate": NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laverne
Image hosted by Photobucket.com

HA ha...
and the RATS take another one in the...

56 posted on 09/02/2006 8:52:18 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laverne

Free Scooter Libby.


57 posted on 09/02/2006 8:53:31 AM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: battlegearboat

Joe Wilson will end life like me.

58 posted on 09/02/2006 8:55:18 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
This whole deal was a SCAM... concocted by the same type of traitors that brought us the forged, Bush memos.

And the same that was done about the Forged Memos will be done--NOTHING

I posted over a year ago that when Bush does something about the memos and Bergers theft of secret documents then I will believe he finally has wised up

I was taken to task by several posters who said "Be Patient "
59 posted on 09/02/2006 9:02:39 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
As a result, the average idiot still thinks that "Bush lied, people died," because Bush has never troubled to deny it. If people tell lies about you for three years, and you don't bother to deny it, then either you are a liar or a coward.

As someone posted on another rhread if he expects to miltary to risk their lives and even die then he can at least fight back
60 posted on 09/02/2006 9:05:08 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson