I understood it just fine. I don't even disagree with your conclusions on the theories. I just think kids would benefit from having the whole issue presented to them so when they make one assessment or another, it's an informed, not a filtered conclusion.
I understood it just fine. I don't even disagree with your conclusions on the theories. I just think kids would benefit from having the whole issue presented to them so when they make one assessment or another, it's an informed, not a filtered conclusion.
So you think it should be left up to kids to decide on what? Just this? Or everything? Or some set of things you've decided on? Should kids be told the facts and then be left to decide on their own what to eat and when to go to bed and what to watch on TV? So we should just present them with our reasoning and then let them decide? At what age would you start taking this approach?
BTW, this approach sounds eerily similar to what a lot of DIMS advocate. How does your approach differ from theirs?