To: kellynla
You still have to get it here by tankers. It's still venerable to Terrorists and evil third world countries.
17 posted on
08/29/2006 8:42:38 AM PDT by
ANGGAPO
(LayteGulfBeachClub)
To: ANGGAPO
"You still have to get it here by tankers` It's still venerable to Terrorists and evil third world countries."
and oil, tankers & piplines aren't?
18 posted on
08/29/2006 8:45:09 AM PDT by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
To: ANGGAPO
LNG is a nearly frozen, slushy liquid, not under any pressure. Furthermore natural gas only combusted under a very narrow range of temperature and oxygen mix. This is why it is some times hard to light your stove. Same thing applies to propane, but not as much. Anyways, you could fire 10 RPGs into a tanker and the mass of frozen LNG would suck them up like nothing. I don't think even in experiment anyone has been able to get a LNG tank to blow up. I don't even know if they have been able to split and spill a tank and get the spilt slush to cook off.
21 posted on
08/29/2006 9:34:43 AM PDT by
Leisler
(Islam is the ROP. I know because the President told me so.)
To: ANGGAPO
The questions which occur to me are:
Would a tanker of LNG in an American harbor make an attractive target for terrorists?
How hard would it be to rupture the container(s) with explosives?
What kind of damage might we expect from such an attack?
22 posted on
08/29/2006 9:36:49 AM PDT by
Max in Utah
(WWBFD? "What Would Ben Franklin Do?")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson