Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tribune7

I'm sorry, the last part of your first paragraph seems to have gotten garbled in editing?

Your second paragraph raises important questions that are addressed by the amendment that you presented me with. The government can only infringe upon a person's rights when that person is committing a crime and due process of law finds that person guilty.


292 posted on 08/29/2006 5:44:23 PM PDT by ahayes ("If intelligent design evolved from creationism, then why are there still creationists?"--Quark2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies ]


To: ahayes
Yes, it was garbled

. . .Wiki defines it as "the ability of an individual or group to keep their lives and personal affairs out of public view, or to control the flow of information about themselves" which seems a pretty good definition and shows how government can go too far in protecting it.

The government can only infringe upon a person's rights when that person is committing a crime and due process of law finds that person guilty.

Which is why privacy can't be considered a right.

303 posted on 08/29/2006 5:54:07 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson