I'm sorry, the last part of your first paragraph seems to have gotten garbled in editing?
Your second paragraph raises important questions that are addressed by the amendment that you presented me with. The government can only infringe upon a person's rights when that person is committing a crime and due process of law finds that person guilty.
. . .Wiki defines it as "the ability of an individual or group to keep their lives and personal affairs out of public view, or to control the flow of information about themselves" which seems a pretty good definition and shows how government can go too far in protecting it.
The government can only infringe upon a person's rights when that person is committing a crime and due process of law finds that person guilty.
Which is why privacy can't be considered a right.