To: bruinbirdman
gosh, it's really a surprise to any but Dims that taxes don't create jobs.
2 posted on
08/24/2006 12:11:31 PM PDT by
cinives
(On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
To: bruinbirdman
* Revenue from the income tax did not lead to property-tax relief -- between 1991 and 2003, Connecticut property-tax collections rose 19.8 percent. Less than 20% increase in twelve years is pretty good. The taxes for my house went up by about 150% in the same period.
3 posted on
08/24/2006 12:12:16 PM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(UN Security Council resolution 1701: I believe it is ceasefire for our time.)
To: bruinbirdman
But... but... what about all that gambling revenue and the cigarette tax windfall?!!
4 posted on
08/24/2006 12:13:14 PM PDT by
johnny7
(“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
To: bruinbirdman
To see what outrageous taxes will do - look to Philadelphia - with the highest wage tax in the nation and has lost 50% of its population...
5 posted on
08/24/2006 12:34:31 PM PDT by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - They want to die for Islam, and we want to kill them.)
To: bruinbirdman
Instead of shifting a tax to a badly misguided sales tax (aka "FAIR" tax) how about simply downsizing the size of government, and making it more efficient?
7 posted on
08/24/2006 12:46:47 PM PDT by
TWohlford
To: bruinbirdman
I have an innovative and brilliant solution to Connecticut's woes:
Cut SpendingTMNow available from participating conservatives near you!
10 posted on
08/24/2006 12:50:37 PM PDT by
TChris
(Banning DDT wasn't about birds. It was about power.)
To: bruinbirdman
How about imposing taxes on all internet transactions? That will surely balance the budget. Right?
Right???????
12 posted on
08/24/2006 1:06:15 PM PDT by
D-Chivas
To: bruinbirdman
Before the income tax was adopted the CT sales tax was 7% and there was a stiff (up to 11% or so), discriminatory income tax on dividends and capital gains. After the general income tax on all income was passed the sales tax was reduced to 6%. The big winner with the income tax (maximum rate 4.5% at the time) was the politicians -- they had a vast honey pot of new money to spend. Another winner was those in lower Connecticut who worked in New York City. They already paid tax to New York State on earnings in NY, and that more than offset their CT income tax on those earnings. The CT tax on their dividends & capital gains dropped by more than half. The legislature repealed the tax but then-governor Weicker vetoed it and the veto couldn't be overridden.
13 posted on
08/24/2006 1:29:55 PM PDT by
Otho
To: bruinbirdman; stowaway; jjm2111; Mrs.LoneGOPinCT; underbyte; badbackman; Bigfitz; mcswan; ...
Trip down memory lane....
16 posted on
08/24/2006 3:28:25 PM PDT by
RaceBannon
(Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson