Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pro-Integration Corporations Should Not Be Shaping Canada's Economic Policy
Vive le Canada ^ | August 15, 2006 | Meera Karunananthan

Posted on 08/24/2006 8:14:38 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer

NACC should not be writing Canadian policy, says Council of Canadians

According to the U.S. Department of State, the North American Competitiveness Council (NACC) met in Washington today to find ways “to cut red tape or eliminate unnecessary barriers to trade in North America,” and to set priorities for the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP).

“Corporations such as Lockheed Martin, Wal-Mart, Suncor and Chevron should not be shaping economic policy between Canada and the United States,” says Jean-Yves LeFort, trade campaigner with the Council of Canadians. “The North American Competitiveness Council gives far too much power to business leaders who are clearly more interested in profit than in what’s best for Canada.”

Prime Minister Stephen Harper named ten corporate executives to the NACC at a meeting of North American leaders in Cancun, Mexico this past March. Nine of those ten appointees represent corporations that are members of the powerful Canadian Council of Chief Executives (CCCE), whose North American Security and Prosperity Initiative led to the signing of the SPP by Canada, Mexico and the U.S. in March 2005.

The CCCE makes no secret of its ultimate goal: the integration of the Canadian and U.S. economies, the harmonization of our foreign, security and immigration policies, as well as common environmental, health and other regulations. In a meeting this past March, the U.S. branch of the NACC set five clear objectives for the SPP, including “energy integration,” and “private sector involvement in border security.”

“Harper and Bush have clearly given business leaders the green light to press forward on a North American model for business security and prosperity,” says Maude Barlow, National Chairperson of the Council of Canadians. “How truly accountable is the Harper government to the Canadian people when it gives preferential treatment to the big-business community in the design of its policies.”

The Council of Canadians demands that Canada cease all further participation in the North American Competitiveness Council and the Security and Prosperity Partnership, and that Stephen Harper consult with Canadians in a meaningful and participatory way on Canada-U.S. relations.

“During the elections, Harper promised to submit any ‘significant international treaty’ to a vote in Parliament,” says LeFort. “It is his duty to make Canada’s ‘security and prosperity’ a matter of public debate.”


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: corporaterights; cuespookymusic; individualrights; sovereignty; spp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-168 next last
To: 1rudeboy

I didn't get to vote on the 5 firms. Where's the democracy?


121 posted on 08/26/2006 9:43:54 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

It might be worse. The terms of the winning contract might not be dislosed to the public.


122 posted on 08/26/2006 9:50:34 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

I just hope the firms aren't foreign.


123 posted on 08/26/2006 9:54:45 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
and Ericsson, the Swedish telecommunications giant which has its U.S. headquarters in Plano.

Sneaky Swedes.

124 posted on 08/26/2006 9:56:51 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
As envisioned by Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, SBInet would marry industry expertise with the 42,000-employee Customs and Border Protection to create a wall of technology, manpower and infrastructure over the next six years. The initial cost is projected at $2.5 billion but could go much higher. [emphasis added]

Unconstitutional public/private partership! [sound of rending garments]
125 posted on 08/26/2006 9:58:42 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

There was someone (I do not recall who), on one of the latest TTC threads, who opined that the Spanish firm building the thing would hire Muslim workers who would pre-install IED's. Visualize that for a moment.


126 posted on 08/26/2006 10:01:02 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
who would pre-install IED's

So we could use them to stop the Chinese invasion? Excellent!

127 posted on 08/26/2006 10:04:18 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Oh, what the heck . . . here's the quote:

Not sure if it's the same company, but a Spanish concern just leased the Indiana toll road for $3.8B
I can see it now, hire a bunch of Spanish moozlims [sic] to do road work and they can pre-install a bunch of IED's.

I am fairly certain this person was being serious (in other words, you can try to tell me he or she was attempting to make a joke, but I don't think you should). I am not linking to the post in order to avoid further embarassment to the FReeper in question.
128 posted on 08/26/2006 10:12:30 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

The term 'North American Integration'.


129 posted on 08/26/2006 10:36:08 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

What about it? I'll wait.


130 posted on 08/26/2006 10:37:51 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Unconstitutional public/private partership!

Why does fascism appeal so much to "free traders"?
131 posted on 08/26/2006 10:48:13 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
What about it? I'll wait.

It sounds scary! How about this one?

Reverse repurchase agreement.

I get shivers just thinking about that one.

132 posted on 08/26/2006 10:51:36 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Why does fascism appeal so much to "fair traders"?


133 posted on 08/26/2006 10:52:06 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Let's take a closer look at the five bidders on the project: Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman/Raytheon, and Ericsson. Are any of them controlled by the government?


134 posted on 08/26/2006 11:08:27 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Northrop Grumman

Photo Release -- Northrop Grumman and City of Corpus Christi, Texas Receive U.S. Conference ...
Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE:NOC) and the City of Corpus Christi, Texas were honored with the Excellence in Public/Private Partnership ...
http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/pages/news_releases.html?d=93501 - 14.8KB - Corporate
75%
||||||||||||||||||||
16 Aug 06
Find Similar

Northrop Grumman Corporation - Defining the Future
Northrop Grumman Corporation
http://www.irconnect.com/noc/pages/news_printer.html?d=93501&print=1 - 9.6KB - Corporate
64%
|||||||||||||||||||
16 Aug 06
Find Similar

http://www.it.northropgrumman.com/pressroom/ pr_curr_24_5482_9642.html
' + strContribTitle + '
http://www.it.northropgrumman.com/pressroom/pr_curr_24_5482_9642.html - 11.3KB - Information Technology
61%
||||||||||||||||||||
17 Aug 06
Find Similar

http://www.it.northropgrumman.com/pressroom/press/2006/ pr4.html
' + strContribTitle + '
http://www.it.northropgrumman.com/pressroom/press/2006/pr4.html - 11.5KB - Information Technology
60%
||||||||||||||||||||
05 Jun 06
Find Similar

Commonwealth of Virginia Invites Northrop Grumman to the Detailed Review Phase of the ...
Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE:NOC) has been chosen as one of two companies by the Commonwealth of Virginia to provide an information ...
http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/pages/news_releases.mhtml?d=68634 - 13.6KB - Corporate
59%
|||||||||||||||||||
16 Aug 06
Find Similar

Commonwealth of Virginia Selects Northrop Grumman for $2 Billion IT Infrastructure ...
Nov. 14, 2005
http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/pages/news_releases.mhtml?d=89731 - 15.0KB - Corporate
54%
|||||||||||||||||||
16 Aug 06
Find Similar

Photo Release -- California's 'Flex Your Power' Partnership Recognizes Northrop Grumman for ...
Flex Your Power, California's statewide energy efficiency partnership, has recognized Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE:NOC) for the ...
http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/pages/news_releases.html?d=99523 - 14.5KB - Corporate
49%
|||||||||||||||||||
16 Aug 06
Find Similar

News Release
Commonwealth of Virginia Selects Northrop Grumman for $2 Billion IT Infrastructure Partnership Contract MCLEAN, Va., Nov. 14 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Northrop ...
http://investor.northropgrumman.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=112386& p=irol-newsArticle_Print&ID=782519&highlight= - 7.3KB - Corporate
48%
|||||||||||||||||||
26 Aug 06
Find Similar

Northrop Grumman News Release
News Release << Back Commonwealth of Virginia Selects Northrop Grumman for $2 Billion IT Infrastructure Partnership Contract MCLEAN, Va., Nov. 14 / ...
http://investor.northropgrumman.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=112386& p=irol-newsArticle&ID=782519&highlight= - 10.7KB - Corporate
48%
|||||||||||||||||||
26 Aug 06
Find Similar

Northrop Grumman News Release
Commonwealth of Virginia Selects Northrop Grumman for $2 Billion IT Infrastructure Partnership Contract MCLEAN, Va., Nov. 14 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Northrop ...
http://investor.northropgrumman.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=112386& p=IROL-nrtext&t=Regular&id=782519& - 9.9KB - Corporate
48%
|||||||||||||||||||
26 Aug 06
Find Similar

http://www.it.northropgrumman.com/pressroom/ pr_curr_1_5482_8340.html
' + strContribTitle + '
http://www.it.northropgrumman.com/pressroom/pr_curr_1_5482_8340.html - 11.0KB - Information Technology
48%
|||||||||||||||||||
14 Nov 05
Find Similar

Northrop Grumman Wins Homeland Security Public Safety Interoperability And Data Integration ...
Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE:NOC) has been awarded a contract by all of the public safety agencies in Santa Clara County, Calif., to ...
http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/pages/news_releases.mhtml?d=61874 - 14.8KB - Corporate
47%
||||||||||||||||||||
16 Aug 06
Find Similar

135 posted on 08/26/2006 11:34:01 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Boeing

[PDF] Unlimited
... Roche. “We look forward to building on this public-private partnership
to serve America’s needs in space.” Then on Oct. 17 ...

www.boeing.com/defense-space/space/bls/au/au_2001-12-01.pdf - Text Version

Boeing: Boeing Joins Partnership to Test Clean-Burning Diesel Fuel
... commitment of Boeing to the program. "We're proud to join this public-private
partnership to further explore cleaner diesel technology.". ...

www.boeing.com/ssg/news/2001/q3/nr_010710d.html - 12k - Cached

[PDF] Boeing Company Missouri Supplier Seminar November 17, 2003
... Missouri Enterprise Business Assistance Center... ..is a public-private partnership
that provides hands-on business and technical assistance to Missouri ...

www.boeing.com/defense-space/ic/fcs/bia/031202_mo_briefings/031202_mo_enterprise.pdf - Text Version

Boeing: Restelli: Hard Realities: Transforming Defense Logistics
... That public/private partnership brought complementary interests of both parties
together, resulting in a 30 percent reduction in the customer cost of ownership ...

www.boeing.com/news/speeches/1999/restelli_991203.htm - 34k - Cached

Boeing: Spong: Logistics - Is it working?
... That public/private partnership brought complementary interests of both parties
together, resulting in a 30 percent reduction in the customer cost of ownership ...

www.boeing.com/news/speeches/2001/spong_010411.html - 27k - Cached

Boeing: Spong: Military Privatization: Opportunities for the ...
... Our KC-135 Programmed Depot Maintenance work was brought to San Antonio through
a public/private partnership with the Ogden Air Logistics Center, where we ...

www.boeing.com/news/speeches/2002/spong_020410.html - 20k - Cached

136 posted on 08/26/2006 11:35:10 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
Cornyn's bill requires the government of Mexico to raise tax revenue to 18 percent of the gross national product. The current tax rate is approximately 9 percent.

So now Cornyn is authoring legislation telling Mexico to raise more revenue. That country's in the dumps as it is; it probably needs a tax CUT! What a stupid geek!

137 posted on 08/26/2006 11:37:44 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Going partly violently to the thing 24-7!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
So you learned how to use Google, excellent. Presumably you are now arguing (funny thing that, making me assume) that Boeing, et al., are examples of fascism. I use the word "assume," mind you, because you have yet to do anything more than cut & paste.

What happens to the central protectionist claim that certain industries are vital to our national security? What about the necessity of protecting our sovereignty by maintaining a strong industrial base? You'd rather that Boeing not exist at all, or simply not partner with our government on any project? What form would you have Boeing take in order to avoid insidious and unconstitutional partnerships with the government that you fear so much?

[whump--another protectionist brain implodes]

138 posted on 08/26/2006 11:45:52 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

That bill was withdrawn weeks ago. You might have forgotten.


139 posted on 08/26/2006 11:46:52 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Ok, so now we have established the companies involved in the north american Integration, the erasing of our borders between mexico and canada, are also engaged in a fascistic relationship with federal, state and sometimes local governments.

Now, why do you defend fascistic public-private partnerships?


140 posted on 08/26/2006 12:12:27 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-168 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson