To: G8 Diplomat
This definition makes logical sense. I don't think Kuiper objects should be considered planets.
Still, if I'd had a vote (which I don't) I would have voted for Pluto too, for historical reasons and so the public won't think science is too malleable a concept. Besides, it seems cheesy to do this so close to Clyde's death.
To: colorado tanker
This definition makes logical sense. I don't think Kuiper objects should be considered planets.
I agree.
To: colorado tanker
Still, if I'd had a vote (which I don't) I would have voted for Pluto too, for historical reasons and so the public won't think science is too malleable a concept. What?!? It is the very fact that Science is malleable that makes it Science, not religion.
110 posted on
08/25/2006 6:34:06 AM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson