Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: razzle
...or fake skulls

You still babbling about fake skulls?

I have challenged you before to document your claims, but all I hear is silence. I must conclude you have no evidence to back your claims. But, lets try once more.

Is this skull fake? If so, how?



Fossil: KNM-ER 3733

Site: Koobi Fora (Upper KBS tuff, area 104), Lake Turkana, Kenya (4, 1)

Discovered By: B. Ngeneo, 1975 (1)

Estimated Age of Fossil: 1.75 mya * determined by Stratigraphic, faunal, paleomagnetic & radiometric data (1, 4)

Species Name: Homo ergaster (1, 7, 8), Homo erectus (3, 4, 7), Homo erectus ergaster (25)

Gender: Female (species presumed to be sexually dimorphic) (1, 8)

Cranial Capacity: 850 cc (1, 3, 4)

Information: Tools found in same layer (8, 9). Found with KNM-ER 406 A. boisei (effectively eliminating single species hypothesis) (1)

Interpretation: Adult (based on cranial sutures, molar eruption and dental wear) (1)

See original source for notes:
Source: http://www.mos.org/evolution/fossils/fossilview.php?fid=33

85 posted on 08/25/2006 10:14:59 AM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman

Evolution appears to be the only "scientific theory" which drives the interpretation of evidence...where the evidence doesn't drive the theory. Researchers assume that macro evolution is a fact (based on what?), and then every little bone fragment they find must fit the theory.


89 posted on 08/25/2006 1:51:12 PM PDT by My2Cents (A pirate's life for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson