To: RunningWolf; Coyoteman
"Whether Piltdwon was hoax, fraud or honest mistake"
A 1000 year old human skull with a moderm orangutan jaw bone glued to it, is hardly an honest mistake. And as you say, the "scietific" community (all the atheists, anyway) was salavating, not questioning. Of course, anyone who questions the tenents of darwinism is ostracized or fired.
833 posted on
08/28/2006 5:39:11 AM PDT by
razzle
(darwin is an emperor who has no clothes)
To: razzle
And as you say, the "scietific" community (all the atheists, anyway) was salavating, not questioning.
Please provide evidence to support your claim.
834 posted on
08/28/2006 5:46:16 AM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: razzle
Yes you are correct but in order to make a point I was giving them the extreme benefit of doubt. The point is they were (and most likely are to this day) seduced by their desire to see these things.
Take a look at some of the 'hominid skulls' brought as evidence, look at all the odd and ill fitting pieces, the asymmetry in the profile, then add in a margin of error as to dating methods to each fragment.
![](http://i61.photobucket.com/albums/h50/runningwolf_54/33234c5a.jpg)
g
![](http://i61.photobucket.com/albums/h50/runningwolf_54/de6f7084.jpg)
W.
839 posted on
08/28/2006 11:06:11 AM PDT by
RunningWolf
(2-1 Cav 1975)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson