What we are dealing with is a claim that Hitler was a Christian. Table Talk is pretty good evidence that he wasn't. Carrier, who has an agenda to convince the world that Hitler was some kind of a Christian, found some translation problems. Even taking into account that Carrier is right, Table Talk -- using Carrier's claims -- still shows Hitler to be an anti-Christian.
Transubstantiation is not accepted by most Christians. Surely you know that.
Again, we'll call that progress. Another one conceding that Hitler was not a Catholic. And transubstantion is accepted by about half of all Christians.
Hitler was critical of Christianity in some passages, and accepting of much of its doctrine in others.
Like Jesus being an Aryan? LOL.
That was Spencer's phrase, not Darwin's.
Spencer was a Darwnist.
I've read the original Table Talk, in German. Looking at all of the evidence, not just quote-mined passages critical of Christianity, I came to the conclusion that Hitler was a deviant, heretical Christian. He endorsed a personal God, original sin, the sacrifice of Jesus Christ, etc. Werner Jochmann, the editor of the Heim version of the Table Talk, and an expert on the Nazi era, came to a similar conclusion.
arrier, who has an agenda to convince the world that Hitler was some kind of a Christian, found some translation problems.
ROFL! 'Translation problems'. What a curious euphemism for 'outright fabrications'!
Like Jesus being an Aryan? LOL.
Notice, though, he did not question the existence of Jesus. Isaac Newton did not believe Jesus was God. Christians over the years have come up with many, many weird theories - that the English were a lost tribe of Israel, for example.
Spencer was a Darwnist.
Spencer was a philosopher in his own right, whose ideas on 'social evolution' preceded the Origin of Species