Wow! Just looked at some of your posts from other threads and for someone who claims to be vehemently against religious fundamentalism ("no American Taliban") you sure come across as a fundamentalist in your overriding disdain of religion. You know like those libs that just hate people that don't agree with them about the definition of hate. To hate hate - liberalism at it's most hypocritical.
I'll accept that you believe that fundamentalists have overriding disdains for things. But logically, it doesn't follow that anyone who holds a disdain for something is a fundamentalist.
A fundamentalist would be one who holds to a very strict literal interpretation of their source material. Which can get might scary if the source material is flawed.