To: Dimensio
did logic evolve? is it still evolving? perhaps your logic will evolve to be illogical? :D
nazism didn't really care that in your opinion their
premise was not a logical conclusion of the Theory...the point is matter of fact-ly, they still applied it to their ideology and with the backing of the German scientific/intellectual community convinced a great many that the survival of a healthier population was more important than compassion for an individual.
it seems quiet easy to do when the highest moral authority is that human which survives.
669 posted on
08/24/2006 6:57:40 PM PDT by
flevit
To: flevit
did logic evolve?
No.
premise was not a logical conclusion of the Theory...the point is matter of fact-ly, they still applied it to their ideology and with the backing of the German scientific/intellectual community convinced a great many that the survival of a healthier population was more important than compassion for an individual.
My point is that if their reasoning is not logical, then it is incorrect to say that they applied the theory of evolution.
670 posted on
08/24/2006 7:03:16 PM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: flevit
Blaming Darwin and Evolution for the atrocities of the Nazis is no different than blaming Henri Becquerel for the deaths at Nagasaki and Hiroshima.
If you really, really, dislike the SToE then I suggest you develop a new theory and show, without distorting any laws of physics, that your theory explains the observed evidence better than the StoE. Then you can show how it explains observations the SToE cannot.
Until you do that you are just blowing so much smoke.
681 posted on
08/24/2006 8:58:57 PM PDT by
b_sharp
(Why bother with a tagline? Even they eventually wear out! (Second Law of Taglines))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson