Skip to comments.
Buchanan Declares: Third World Conquest of America
Drudge Report ^
| August 20, 2006
| Matt Drudge
Posted on 08/20/2006 4:57:47 PM PDT by VU4G10
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 441-443 next last
To: VU4G10
Somebody hand Pat a rifle and show him which direction to fire.
221
posted on
08/20/2006 8:10:18 PM PDT
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
To: irishjuggler
We get it, guys, Pat Buchanan is the worst person in human history. With that out of the way, how about addressing his very valid arguments about criminal immigrants? Thank you. Thank you. It's absolutely crazy the way PB stirs this forum up. Why refute the arguments PB puts out when you can just foam at the mouth.
222
posted on
08/20/2006 8:10:32 PM PDT
by
FreeRadical
(That's no open container officer. That's my beer.)
To: ndt
No, I am saying it's different for a number of reasons:
1. The federal government didn't pick up the tab with long-term assistance because it didn't exist. Immigrants received help primarily from their families, churches, etc.
2. The "melting pot" philosophy existed as opposed to today's multi-culturalism. Immigrants wanted to blend into the fabric. They accepted the United States and its values rather than expecting the U.S. to accept theirs.
223
posted on
08/20/2006 8:11:35 PM PDT
by
BW2221
To: VU4G10
Between the 1RECONQUISTA and the 2MUSLIM plan for world domination (what's their name for it?), we're getting squeezed out.
To: bnelson44
Amazon.com Sales Rank: #37 in Books
225
posted on
08/20/2006 8:18:01 PM PDT
by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
To: BW2221
"The federal government didn't pick up the tab with long-term assistance because it didn't exist."
Well according to this issue of "American Patriot" spending taxpayer money to support the immigrants was a primary concern.
"The "melting pot" philosophy existed as opposed to today's multi-culturalism."
You seem to be under the misconception that when you toss an new item into a pot to melt, it becomes like the previous contents of the pot. Actually, the contents of the pot also changes and the whole becomes something new.
During the early days of Irish immigration, it was feared that the "criminal foreigners" would change our American culture and you know what, it did, and we are better off and culturally richer for it.
226
posted on
08/20/2006 8:20:26 PM PDT
by
ndt
To: All
Gee whiz. Looks like its openmike night at LewCrockwell around here.
Some of you don't get it. Yeah, the folks who claim that Pat is being subjected to ad hominem attacks because of his views on illegal immigration. I'm talking to you.
There are, as far as I can tell, only two plausible reasons why a poster would go off on Buchanon on this thread:
1. He's an ass.
2. He's against illegal immigration.
Now, given the conservative nature of the posters on this site, which do you think is the most likely reason for somebody here to lambaste dear Patrick?
So, kindly spare us the gloom-and-doom, endisnear, last days of Rome, barbarians are coming over the walls claptrap.
We get it. Nobody here is pro-illegal immigration.
We just think that Patrick Buchanon is an ass and an embarassment to the conservative movement. And we don't want him as a fellow traveller, as right or wrong as he may be on this single issue.
227
posted on
08/20/2006 8:20:27 PM PDT
by
A Balrog of Morgoth
(With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the RINOs in terror before me.)
To: VU4G10
If Buchanan was good enough for President Reagan he's good enough for me. The same people who constantly trash Buchanan are the sames ones who tout phonies like Mccain and Giuliani as Presidential Candidates.
228
posted on
08/20/2006 8:22:59 PM PDT
by
jherd
To: jherd
Guess you're a fan of Paul Craig Roberts too.
229
posted on
08/20/2006 8:23:46 PM PDT
by
A Balrog of Morgoth
(With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the RINOs in terror before me.)
To: VU4G10
How the government has changed.
Since nopardons has apparently signed off, I figured I'd educate my self about the late 19th century U,S. government.
Here is Grover Cleveland's Cabinet according to Wikipedia:
OFFICE NAME TERM
President Grover Cleveland 18931897
Vice President Adlai E. Stevenson 18931897
Secretary of State Walter Q. Gresham 18931895
Richard Olney 18951897
Secretary of the Treasury John G. Carlisle 18931897
Secretary of War Daniel S. Lamont 18931897
Attorney General Richard Olney 18931895
Judson Harmon 18951897
Postmaster General Wilson S. Bissell 18931895
William L. Wilson 18951897
Secretary of the Navy Hilary A. Herbert 18931897
Secretary of the Interior Hoke Smith 18931896
David R. Francis 18961897
Secretary of Agriculture Julius Sterling Morton 18931897
230
posted on
08/20/2006 8:25:57 PM PDT
by
BW2221
To: VU4G10
Buchanan is an apparent racist. Also, why continue to tie Europe in with the United States? Sort of shows his racist tendencies.
Assimilation can to be pushed on all legal immigrants, and some of the most unassimilating people are legal European immigrants.
To: VU4G10
Buchanan is an apparent racist. Also, why continue to tie Europe in with the United States? Sort of shows his racist tendencies.
Assimilation ought to be pushed on all legal immigrants, and some of the most unassimilating people are legal European immigrants.
To: VU4G10
BYE BYE America! It's just the matter of time before Balkanization occurs here as well.
Thank you Mr President!
Bush will go down in history as one of the worst Republican presidents EVER!
233
posted on
08/20/2006 8:30:20 PM PDT
by
nikola
To: Crazieman; Admin Moderator
Why was comment 2 removed, what was typed besides something about a broken clock.
Admin Moderator: can edits of articles be explained in more detail, and can there also be explanations for why comments are removed?
To: Lurker
For Pat Buchanan being wrong, ditto.
To: jherd
If Buchanan was good enough for President Reagan he's good enough for me. The same people who constantly trash Buchanan are the sames ones who tout phonies like Mccain and Giuliani as Presidential Candidates.
In 1981, Giuliani was named Associate Attorney General, placing him in the third-highest position in the Department of Justice. As Associate Attorney General, Giuliani supervised all of the US Attorney Offices' Federal law enforcement agencies, the Department of Corrections, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and the United States Marshals Service.
In a well-publicized 1982 case, Giuliani testified in defense of the US government's "detention posture" of interning over 2,000 unlawfully-immigrated Haitian refugees in refugee camps, at one point stating that there was "no political repression" under President Jean-Claude "Baby Doc" Duvalier.[3]
In 1983, Giuliani was appointed U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. It was in this position that he first gained national prominence by prosecuting numerous high-profile cases, including the successful prosecutions of Wall Street figures Ivan Boesky and Michael Milken for insider trading.
Giuliani attracted some criticism for arranging very public arrests of people, then dropping charges for lack of evidence rather than going to trial. He also spearheaded the effort to jail drug dealers, combat organized crime, break the web of corruption in government, and prosecute white-collar criminals. He amassed a record of 4,152 convictions with only 25 reversals.
It was in 1983 that Giuliani indicted Marc Rich on charges of tax evasion and making illegal oil deals with Iran during the hostage crisis. Rich fled the United States to avoid prosecution, and was controversially pardoned by President Bill Clinton in 2001.[4]
Who was President in 1981? If Giuliani was good enough for Reagan he should be good enough for you.
*note:this is from wikipedia, so it's possible some of the particulars are erroneous, but I think they got the year of his appointment right.
236
posted on
08/20/2006 8:31:36 PM PDT
by
A Balrog of Morgoth
(With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the RINOs in terror before me.)
To: A Balrog of Morgoth
West United States......
And Rome did sort of fall from an influx of Germanic immigrants....because the Romans were largely racist and didn't assimilate them. So in a way it is people such as Buchanan that are bringing about the fall of the United States, at least as much, if not more, than the immigrants.
To: sinkspur
Mr. Buchanan seems to be racist against all nonEuropeans/European-descended people. And apparently even against some European/European-descendees (Azkenazim).
To: Jedi Master Pikachu
When was the last time you saw Germans or Italians or Irish marching in our streets screeching about reconquering part of our country, demanding special rights and privileges usually reserved for American citizens or latching themselves onto our welfare system sucking it dry as well as bankrupting hospitals like illegal mexicans have been doing for years?........Europeans some of the most unassimilating people......what a joke!
To: Crazieman
Illegal immigration is wrong. Immigration of nonEuropeans is not.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 441-443 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson