Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: steamroller

I agree with what you said, especially illegals.

AFAIC, illegals are just another criminal to be apprehended or shot in the attempt.

"We the People of the United States,..." simply does not include intruders, under any rational interpretation.

I have no problem with the seriously mentally ill, IF it is competent medical authority AND the courts, AND normal 'due process', complete with attorneys & even a guardian, if necessary doing the finding & ruling.

I get queasy about felons getting an automatic loss, just on the basis of what has been elevated to a felony in recent years. OTOH, violent felons, especially repeaters, shouldn't be on the street, anyway.


104 posted on 08/18/2006 6:00:06 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (Islam: a Satanically Transmitted Disease, spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: ApplegateRanch
I have no problem with the seriously mentally ill, IF it is competent medical authority AND the courts, AND normal 'due process', complete with attorneys & even a guardian, if necessary doing the finding & ruling.

If you gonna take guns away from the mentally ill and Felons then there is absolutely no reason Liberals cantmake even more 'exemptions" in order to "serve the peopel". The second amendment is exactly what it says it is. No limits on who can own one. No license BS !
123 posted on 08/18/2006 9:32:42 PM PDT by newfarm4000n (God Bless Taxpayers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson