Skip to comments.
Chinese envoy tells U.S. to 'shut up'
Yahoo News ^
| 18 Aug 2006
| staff
Posted on 08/18/2006 6:32:39 AM PDT by shrinkermd
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
To: TropicalFishGuy
"Chinese diplomacy sure isn't very, um, diplomatic."
Not when they think they've got the upper hand. How much easier can we make it for them. We tranfer technonlogy to them outright, our high-tech companies move production to China, they have thousands of spies in the US some of whom work for our government, they bribe our elected officials. It's almost as if someone decided it's China's turn to rule the world.
41
posted on
08/18/2006 7:19:50 AM PDT
by
dljordan
To: shrinkermd
To: shrinkermd
Sha Zukang, ni bu yao shuo hwa le!
43
posted on
08/18/2006 7:51:03 AM PDT
by
FixitGuy
To: edpc
Is there any other kind?
I'd like to order a code red on this diplomat, to be certain.
To: shrinkermd
I've got a bad feeling about this. Fighting the Japs in WW2 could seem like a picnic compared to fighting China. They have far more soldiers to expend and are willing to use them. We are no longer the world's greatest industrial powerhouse that can crank out a limitless supply of war material -- they are. China has nukes, too. Besides Taiwan, what are China's ambitions? Think Siberia -- Russia has 1/5 the population of China, a pathetic military and is spread too thin to defend that large of a land mass. Siberia with its vast natural resources (oil, gas, timber, ores) has to the grand prize to fuel China's industrial and imperial ambitions.
45
posted on
08/18/2006 8:14:19 AM PDT
by
TexasRepublic
(Afghan protest - "Death to Dog Washers!")
To: shrinkermd
Horrifying thought for the day. China is caught in a demographic nightmare. With 1.3 billion people, more and more their domestic policy is turning to "lebensraum".
At first, this means overwhelming their Uighar and Tibetan minorities with Han Chinese; building new, Han-only cities next to the ancient native cities, then diverting all resources to the new cities. But even that is not enough, and not fast enough.
So now they are starting to eye unoccupied lands in adjacent nations, even going so far as to lay railroad tracks into the wilderness.
Not too long ago, however, it was noted that they have built a scale model terrain map of their disputed border with India, and here is where the real potential for horror begins. Because India, likewise, is becoming increasingly overburdened with people.
Most specifically, men. Because of their mutual prejudice against daughters, millions of whom have been aborted or killed, both China and India have imbalanced demographics.
As many as 30 to 50 million men, or more, are growing up with no chance to have a job or a wife. They are generally uneducated, and a great burden on their respective societies. A dangerous one.
There is a distinct possibility that China and India could have a war, solely to 'cull' their extra males. A "demographic war". No matter the official casus belli, the real reason would be to mutually exterminate millions of extra men.
Such a war would be in a desolate, isolated place. A giant "no-man's land" between the two countries. Millions of conscripts would fight with small arms supported by massed artillery fires. Each sides' regular armies would stay in the rear as a second eschelon never committed, as endless replacements are sent to the front.
Massacres not seen since the trench warfare of World War I. An intentional stalemate devoid of tactics save to charge the enemy machine guns and to fire endless barrages of high explosive artillery--the deadliest weapon on the battlefield.
Both nations are already aware of this as a possibility, but so far, each has only considered a modern sophisticated war between technological, professional armies, not a "peasant war" of attrition.
To: Old Student
47
posted on
08/18/2006 8:43:57 AM PDT
by
naturalized
( Chazaq, Yisrael!)
To: Popocatapetl
48
posted on
08/18/2006 8:49:56 AM PDT
by
naturalized
( Chazaq, Yisrael!)
To: GulfBreeze
The last time this happened, we found out that when we play these games, we give the other guys an advantage of something like 2 or 3 planes to each of ours.
49
posted on
08/18/2006 8:54:41 AM PDT
by
Ghost of Philip Marlowe
(Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
To: shrinkermd
Oh.
Ok.
In that case...
Or is it like listening to Sylvester as he coughs out bright little yellow feathers?
To: 50sDad
"Sha said the world need not worry about China's growing economic and military might because "China basically is a peace-loving nation."
Two words: Tiananmen Square.
One word -- Waco
Since China has a history of pretty much staying within her own borders, I'm not inclined to the jingoistic hypocrisy of condemning there what we spend billions to do here.
51
posted on
08/18/2006 9:08:29 AM PDT
by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com)
To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
Well that would certainly make a difference...
Thanks.
Anyone else have an insight on this? Ghost was commenting on my question about India defeating US Air/Navy in war games earlier this year.
52
posted on
08/18/2006 9:14:37 AM PDT
by
GulfBreeze
(I don't believe in athiests. They just don't exist...)
To: gcruse
Their growing need for oil has them traveling the world, making deals with the worst regimes around.
53
posted on
08/18/2006 9:15:02 AM PDT
by
monkeywrench
(Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
To: FixitGuy
54
posted on
08/18/2006 9:19:26 AM PDT
by
GulfBreeze
(I don't believe in athiests. They just don't exist...)
To: FreedomNeocon
On a diplomatic mission to China as we speak. :)
55
posted on
08/18/2006 9:21:20 AM PDT
by
xp38
To: monkeywrench
"Travelling the world making deals with worst regimes..."
We make deals with Saudi Arabia so we're above it all?
Now, if they were travelling the world, *overthrowing* regimes, I might agree with you, but you might not think overthrowing regimes was a bad thing by then.
Ah, well, we'll always find someone to demonize. It's the American Way.
56
posted on
08/18/2006 9:31:42 AM PDT
by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com)
To: GulfBreeze
"Anyone else have an insight on this?"
Yes. Important US systems were either turned off or used in a degraded capacity to make things more even. Further, the most sensitive technologies and tactics are never used in joint exercises - they're saved for the real thing.
To: PreciousLiberty
Thanks. I wish I had a write up on this excercise.
58
posted on
08/18/2006 10:18:38 AM PDT
by
GulfBreeze
(I don't believe in athiests. They just don't exist...)
To: shrinkermd
"China's military buildup is not threatening anyone," Sha said. "This is a legitimate defense." Defense against... whom? ...praytell.
59
posted on
08/18/2006 10:21:08 AM PDT
by
TChris
(Banning DDT wasn't about birds. It was about power.)
To: naturalized
Ya know what's really, REALLY funny? For all the years I've been using that line, I'd forgotten where I got it! Thanks for reminding me!
Not that I want to sit down and watch it with my kids...
60
posted on
08/18/2006 3:31:41 PM PDT
by
Old Student
(We have a name for the people who think indiscriminate killing is fine. They're called "The Bad Guys)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson