Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Loyolas Mattman
I'd hate to think we're sitting passively by, waiting to see what happens

What choice with 80% of Americans not seeing the danger? If Washington moves to eliminate the danger without being hit hard first, Congress won't fund the effort, not even a dollar. If Washington waits until the Pearl Harbor scenario, then 80% will move past anxiety and into fear and then it is time for action.

131 posted on 08/18/2006 9:13:37 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: RightWhale

Millions shouldn't die because 80% of Americans are morons.

This is the proverbial "perp in a dark alley going for his waistband..." Shoot first, ask questions later.

Not a policy for general application, but it applies here quite well.


133 posted on 08/18/2006 9:27:01 AM PDT by Loyolas Mattman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

To: RightWhale

Two other problems with waiting for Pearl Harbor:

1) The weapons involved are more powerful - a nuke in a civilian area means tens of thousands dead in a blink of an eye. FDR could, in a sense, afford to trade Pearl Harbor, a military target, for entry into the war - assuming he knew what was coming; and

2) The modern media would have the President impeached and convicted within 30 minutes or so if it came out that the government had evidence of a possible nuclear attack and chose to do nothing about it. And, it's not like Iran and NK are hiding their intentions.

Damned if you do, damned if you don't. I'd rather do...


134 posted on 08/18/2006 9:45:26 AM PDT by Loyolas Mattman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson