[antiRepublicrat]

But if Hillary was authorizing the NSA to intercept international phone calls to the US originating from known terrorist-affiliated phone numbers overseas, I certainly wouldn't object.

Given the FBI files case, do you really think that's all she'd be intercepting?

[dead]

Given the FBI files case, do you really think that's all she'd be intercepting?

Of course not, and I didn't imply that I did.

I would not object to any reasonable pursuit of terrorist activity by any administration, and I would object to any abuses for political or personal reasons.

The idea that you must support both or oppose both is absurd. Recognizing the legitimate national security reasons that the interception of international phone calls is acceptable does not mean that you can not object to abuses of that same power.

[San Jacinto]

Oh, I get it. Judge Diggs (or whatever) was just protecting us from a potential Hillary Clinton presidency. Is that your point?