To: MikefromOhio
I think President Bush should just ignore any judges ruling and let the chips fall where they may. If judges start putting the government lawyers in jail for contempt then Bush should have his prepared Presidential Pardons ready.
112 posted on
08/17/2006 9:36:57 AM PDT by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: tobyhill
I think President Bush should just ignore any judges ruling and let the chips fall where they may. If judges start putting the government lawyers in jail for contempt then Bush should have his prepared Presidential Pardons ready.
I don't think he should just ignore them, that is a very dangerous precedent to set. I think he should work the system, and that means filing an appeal and a request for an injunction of some sort for national security reasons....
117 posted on
08/17/2006 9:38:44 AM PDT by
MikefromOhio
(aka MikeinIraq - I BEEEEEEELLLLLLIIEEEEVVVEEEEEEE in the conspiracy of the flying knee....)
To: tobyhill
No need for that, her opinion is not the final say on the matter.
I wondering why she overturned higher precedent.
141 posted on
08/17/2006 9:49:39 AM PDT by
TeleStraightShooter
(The Right To Take Life is NOT a Constitutional "Liberty" protected by the 14th Amendment)
To: tobyhill
You are exactly right: President Bush should just ignore the ruling.
People seem to think that judges are the final authority on what is constitutional and what is not.
When the Constitution grants a specific power to the President (like defending the country from foreign enemies as Commander in Chief), legitimate Presidentional actions to carry out that responsibility cannot simply be waved off by the ACLU and some friendly judge.
After President Bush tells the judge to stuff it, the people ultimate decide on the constitutionality of his actions through future elections or impeachment.
174 posted on
08/17/2006 10:03:39 AM PDT by
redfog
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson