Skip to comments.
Federal Judge rules NSA surveillance unconstitutional!
ABC Radio News
| 8/17/2006
| ABC Radio News
Posted on 08/17/2006 9:06:43 AM PDT by sinkspur
A federal district judge in Detroit has ruled that the Bush administration's NSA surveillance of phone conversations is unconstitutional.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aclu; aclulist; activistcourts; activistjudge; annadiggstaylor; carterappointee; carterlegacy; counterterrorism; dumbassdonkruling; goodgrief; goodruling; govwatch; gramsci; impeach; itsoverjohnny; judgislators; judicialjihad; judicialtyranny; judiciary; libertarians; mysharia; nationalsecurity; nsa; ruling; spying; thankyoujimmycarter; tyrantsinblackrobes; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 581-586 next last
To: West Coast Conservative
West Coast Conservative says: "A victory for the terrorists and liberals."
Isn't that redundant?
81
posted on
08/17/2006 9:27:36 AM PDT
by
piytar
To: puppypusher
reporters saying they can't talk to their alqueda contacts.
no joke.
82
posted on
08/17/2006 9:27:38 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Dems_R_Losers
Somebody please tell me how the ACLU had standing to bring this suit in the first place? They represent radical mosques in Michigan, many of whose members have ties to various Al Qaeda groups.
To: Abathar
"Black Judges Association and Women Judges Association."Oh boy; a "two-fer" (two credits for placing a double-minority in a position of power....one for the "female", and one for the "black"...)
To: Republican Red
The American Civil Liberties Union filed the lawsuit on behalf of journalists, scholars and lawyers who say the program has made it difficult for them to do their jobs.Boo hoo. Not doing this program would make it more difficult for our national security folks to do THEIR jobs.
I realize journalists, scholars and lawyers consider their jobs to be much more important than anyone else's, but I fly over the Atlantic a few times per years on business and I'm more concerned about a bomb at 35,000 feet than whether or not some fishhack, egghead or ambulance-chaser can profit from a conversation with a terrorist.
85
posted on
08/17/2006 9:28:35 AM PDT
by
You Dirty Rats
(I Love Free Republic!!!)
To: Peach
I'd say that's the first impression (they've no common sense), except it's a pattern.
They continually steer our ship towards the falls.
Aargh, I say it's time for them to be put off in their own little boat, eh, Mr. Christian?
86
posted on
08/17/2006 9:29:15 AM PDT
by
norraad
("What light!">Blues Brothers)
To: sinkspur
This wasn't unexpected and even as she has done this it will be overturned by the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals. The unfortunate part of this is the part in her decision ordering an immediate halt and now the President must ignore her, wait for appeal and halt the program or have the AG file an emergency appeal based on national security maybe even to FISA.
87
posted on
08/17/2006 9:29:36 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: norraad
Well, you know what? The next terrorist attack I'm laying directly at the feet of the Democrats. Directly.
88
posted on
08/17/2006 9:30:21 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: sinkspur
We have a sun belt, a rust belt and a snow belt.
Coming soon - a suicide belt.
BUMP
89
posted on
08/17/2006 9:30:45 AM PDT
by
capitalist229
(Get Democrats out of our pockets and Republicans out of our bedrooms.)
To: Steve_Seattle
90
posted on
08/17/2006 9:31:01 AM PDT
by
se_ohio_young_conservative
("The only thing we have to fear is fear itself" Franklin D. Roosevelt.)
To: sinkspur; All
91
posted on
08/17/2006 9:31:12 AM PDT
by
AliVeritas
(Talk to those who kill their own children, by Jihad/PR ? Remember Beslan.)
To: sinkspur
Irrelevent.
The administration will continue to persue this method until/unless the Supreme Court rules against it.
92
posted on
08/17/2006 9:31:18 AM PDT
by
Mariner
To: traditional1
That's exactly the way I see it today, but remember (God help us), if the Hildabeast were in the White House in 2008, would you feel comfortable with HER use of this power? I wouldn't feel comfortable with Hillary doing anything except retiring or going to prison.
But if Hillary was authorizing the NSA to intercept international phone calls to the US originating from known terrorist-affiliated phone numbers overseas, I certainly wouldn't object.
93
posted on
08/17/2006 9:31:20 AM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Republican Red
"
A year later, she married S. Martin Taylor, then director of the Michigan Employment Security Commission. In 1979, three years after she campaigned for Jimmy Carter's presidential bid, Carter rewarded Taylor with a lifetime appointment to U.S. District Court in Detroit.
Taylor was the first black female federal district judge in the U.S. 6th Circuit, comprising Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee."
To: hipaatwo
"An attorney and judge, Anna Diggs Taylor was the first African-American woman appointed to a federal judgeship in Michigan and later became the first African-American woman to be named chief federal judge in the Eastern District of Michigan. Taylor has used her positions to advance civil rights throughout the United States."
The money paragraph. Another flaming liberal activist judge.
95
posted on
08/17/2006 9:31:45 AM PDT
by
headstamp
(Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
To: tobyhill
I'd expect the emergency appeal is already filed....
96
posted on
08/17/2006 9:31:56 AM PDT
by
MikefromOhio
(aka MikeinIraq - I BEEEEEEELLLLLLIIEEEEVVVEEEEEEE in the conspiracy of the flying knee....)
To: dead
"authorizing the NSA to intercept international phone calls to the US originating from known terrorist-affiliated phone numbers overseas, I certainly wouldn't object."I agree....but I'm sure she would NOT do something like that, to appease her voter base, for sure.
To: pissant
You are exactly correct. People scream about the runaway judiciary. Justifiably so...it is runaway. But the Constitution provides the legislature with a means to hold them in check...impeachment. From lowest court to highest court, if judges act like morons they should be impeached.
98
posted on
08/17/2006 9:32:56 AM PDT
by
Axeslinger
(Where has my country gone?)
To: Peach
Wasn't it a wiretap which (helped) thwart the plot to blow up planes recently?
This judge is sick.
99
posted on
08/17/2006 9:33:16 AM PDT
by
jdm
(I gotta give the Helen Thomas obsession a rest.)
To: AliVeritas
100
posted on
08/17/2006 9:33:21 AM PDT
by
hipaatwo
(Kofi anti-Semite who sucks up to Arab dictators and presides over UN choking on its own filth-JPod)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 581-586 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson